Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strong Metal–Support Interactions Enhance the Activity and Durability of Platinum Supported on Tantalum-Modified Titanium Dioxide Electrocatalysts

Kumar, Amod, Ramani, Vijay·2014·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Rutile phase tantalum-modified titanium oxide (Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 ) was synthesized and studied using electrochemical and spectroscopic methods to evaluate its efficacy as a corrosion-resistant electrocatalyst support material. A 20 wt % Pt supported on Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 catalyst was prepared and compared in terms of activity and stability against a 20 wt % Pt supported on Vulcan XC-72R carbon catalyst (20% Pt/C; synthesized in-house) and a 46 wt % Pt/C commercially sourced catalyst (Tanaka KK). Catalysts 20% Pt/Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2, 20% Pt/C, and 46% Pt/C possessed electrochemically active surface areas (ECSAs) of 60, 57, and 65 m 2 g –1, respectively, and mass activities for the oxygen reduction reaction (at 0.9 V vs RHE) of 185, 148, and 224 mA mg –1 Pt, respectively, as evaluated in an operating polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Accelerated stability tests (ASTs) were performed on membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) in an operating fuel cell to investigate both support and platinum catalyst stability. The loss in voltage at a current density of 0.4 Acm –2 after 10 000 support stability AST cycles was only 23 mV for 20% Pt/Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2, over an order of magnitude lower than the losses observed in 20% Pt/C and 46% Pt/C (∼330 mV). Although the latter loss would correspond to catastrophic fuel cell and stack failure, the former is well within the limits of system tolerance. Post-mortem transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses of the electrocatalyst recovered from cycled MEAs confirmed the excellent stability of Pt nanoparticles supported on Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 . The average Pt particle size increased by ∼20% in 20% Pt/Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2, as compared with a doubling in size in the case of 20% Pt/C and a near tripling in size in 46% Pt/C. The existence of strong metal–support interactions in 20% Pt/Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 was ascertained from the X-ray absorption near edge structure analysis. The number of unfilled d states in 20% Pt/Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 was found to be ∼1.47, which was lower than the value of ∼1.60 found in both the carbon-supported Pt catalysts. The decrease in the number of unfilled d states confirmed electron donation from the Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 support to the Pt atoms, resulting in an increased electron density on Pt. This interaction enhanced both electrocatalytic activity and catalyst stability, as evidenced by the results above.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs500116h

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, A., & Ramani, V.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2014-04-15
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
1516-1525
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2316119555
Cited by
190
References
3
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.