The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly Efficient CdS/WO3 Photocatalysts: Z-Scheme Photocatalytic Mechanism for Their Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Evolution under Visible Light
Abstract
Natural photosynthesis is usually recognized as an efficient mechanism to achieve solar energy conversion. We construct a CdS/WO 3 nanojunction achieving a Z-scheme for clean hydrogen fuel evolution by mimicking the natural photosynthesis. Although WO 3 alone cannot be used for H 2 evolution from water splitting, it can significantly increase the H 2 evolution activity of CdS through a Z-scheme mechanism with lactate as electron donor. The CdS/WO 3 photocatalyst has a high H 2 evolution rate of 369 μmol g –1 h –1 at a CdS concentration of 20 wt %, which is 5 times as high as that of CdS with lactic acid as electron donor. For further improving the hydrogen production rate, we introduce the noble metal Pt to ameliorate the charge transport between CdS and WO 3 . Good H 2 evolution rates up to 2900 μmol g –1 h –1 were obtained with WPC3, which is about 7.9 times the rate of WC20 with visible radiation. The interesting thing is that the photocatalytic mechanism of CdS/WO 3 is different from the previously reported mechanism. The results of TPV (transient photovoltage) and SPV (surface photovoltage) indicate that the Z-scheme system of CdS/WO 3 can effectively promote charge separation and depress the charges recombining of photogenerated charge in CdS, based on the Z-scheme mechanism, resulting in efficient H 2 production activity under visible light.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation
Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001645 · Cited by 7,876
Xiang, Q., Yu, J., & Jaroniec, M. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja302846n · Cited by 2,360
First-row transition metal dichalcogenide catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction
Kong, D., Cha, J. J., Wang, H., Lee, H. R., & Cui, Y. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee42413h · Cited by 1,031
Meng, F., Li, J., Cushing, S. K., Zhi, M., & Wu, N. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja404851s · Cited by 643
Sasaki, Y., Kato, H., & Kudo, A. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja400238r · Cited by 389
Cited by
Engineering heterogeneous semiconductors for solar water splitting
Li, X., Yu, J., Low, J., Fang, Y., Xiao, J., & Chen, X. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c4ta04461d · Cited by 1,888
Direct Z-scheme photocatalysts: Principles, synthesis, and applications
Xu, Q., Zhang, L., Yu, J., Wageh, S., Al-Ghamdi, A. A., & Jaroniec, M. (2018) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.008 · Cited by 1,635
Self-citationChandrasekaran, S., Yao, L., Deng, L., Bowen, C., Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Lin, Z., Peng, F., & Zhang, P. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00664d · Cited by 1,199
Graphene in Photocatalysis: A Review
Li, X., Yu, J., Wageh, S., Al‐Ghamdi, A. A., & Xie, J. (2016) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201600382 · Cited by 1,153
Hong, Y., Jiang, Y., Li, C., Fan, W., Yan, X., Yan, M., & Shi, W. (2016) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.057 · Cited by 730
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L. J., Li, S., Liu, B. K., Wang, D. J., & Xie, T. F.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-09-22
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3724-3729
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321337189
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.