Cited by 2,360Advanced Photocatalysis TechniquesTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

Synergetic Effect of MoS2 and Graphene as Cocatalysts for Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Production Activity of TiO2 Nanoparticles

Xiang, Quanjun, Yu, Jiaguo, Jaroniec, Mietek·2012·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The production of H(2) by photocatalytic water splitting has attracted a lot attention as a clean and renewable solar H(2) generation system. Despite tremendous efforts, the present great challenge in materials science is to develop highly active photocatalysts for splitting of water at low cost. Here we report a new composite material consisting of TiO(2) nanocrystals grown in the presence of a layered MoS(2)/graphene hybrid as a high-performance photocatalyst for H(2) evolution. This composite material was prepared by a two-step simple hydrothermal process using sodium molybdate, thiourea, and graphene oxide as precursors of the MoS(2)/graphene hybrid and tetrabutylorthotitanate as the titanium precursor. Even without a noble-metal cocatalyst, the TiO(2)/MoS(2)/graphene composite reaches a high H(2) production rate of 165.3 μmol h(-1) when the content of the MoS(2)/graphene cocatalyst is 0.5 wt % and the content of graphene in this cocatalyst is 5.0 wt %, and the apparent quantum efficiency reaches 9.7% at 365 nm. This unusual photocatalytic activity arises from the positive synergetic effect between the MoS(2) and graphene components in this hybrid cocatalyst, which serve as an electron collector and a source of active adsorption sites, respectively. This study presents an inexpensive photocatalyst for energy conversion to achieve highly efficient H(2) evolution without noble metals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja302846n

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiang, Q., Yu, J., & Jaroniec, M.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
  • Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Yu, Jiaguo
  • Jaroniec, Mietek
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
134
Issue
15
Pages
6575-6578
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1971008178
Cited by
2,360
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 182 · 2019: 231 · 2018: 297 · 2017: 258 · 2016: 279 · 2015: 234 · 2014: 229 · 2013: 152 · 2012: 48
FWCI
81.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Keywords
photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, photocatalytic water splitting, titanium dioxide nanoparticles, cocatalyst, synergistic effect, noble-metal-free photocatalyst, hydrothermal synthesis, graphene oxide, MoS2, electron collector, adsorption sites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review