Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for Estimation of Protein−Ligand Binding Affinities

Open access
Gallicchio, Emilio, Lapelosa, Mauro, Levy, Ronald M.·2010·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

The Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for the computation of receptor-ligand standard binding free energies with implicit solvation is presented. The method is based on a well established statistical mechanics theory of molecular association. It is shown that, in the context of implicit solvation, the theory is homologous to the test particle method of solvation thermodynamics with the solute-solvent potential represented by the effective binding energy of the protein-ligand complex. Accordingly, in BEDAM the binding constant is computed by means of a weighted integral of the probability distribution of the binding energy obtained in the canonical ensemble in which the ligand is positioned in the binding site but the receptor and the ligand interact only with the solvent continuum. It is shown that the binding energy distribution encodes all of the physical effects of binding. The balance between binding enthalpy and entropy is seen in our formalism as a balance between favorable and unfavorable binding modes which are coupled through the normalization of the binding energy distribution function. An efficient computational protocol for the binding energy distribution based on the AGBNP2 implicit solvent model, parallel Hamiltonian replica exchange sampling and histogram reweighting is developed. Applications of the method to a set of known binders and non-binders of the L99A and L99A/M102Q mutants of T4 lysozyme receptor are illustrated. The method is able to discriminate without error binders from non-binders, and the computed standard binding free energies of the binders are found to be in good agreement with experimental measurements. Analysis of the results reveals that the binding affinities of these systems reflect the contributions from multiple conformations spanning a wide range of binding energies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct1002913

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Gallicchio, E., Lapelosa, M., & Levy, R. M.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2010-08-09
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
2961-2977
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2067669378
Cited by
161
References
5
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.