The DOI matches its Crossref record.
g_wham—A Free Weighted Histogram Analysis Implementation Including Robust Error and Autocorrelation Estimates
Open accessAbstract
The Weighted Histogram Analysis Method (WHAM) is a standard technique used to compute potentials of mean force (PMFs) from a set of umbrella sampling simulations. Here, we present a new WHAM implementation, termed g_wham, which is distributed freely with the GROMACS molecular simulation suite. g_wham estimates statistical errors using the technique of bootstrap analysis. Three bootstrap methods are supported: (i) bootstrapping new trajectories based on the umbrella histograms, (ii) bootstrapping of complete histograms, and (iii) Bayesian bootstrapping of complete histograms, that is, bootstrapping via the assignment of random weights to the histograms. Because methods ii and iii consider only complete histograms as independent data points, these methods do not require the accurate calculation of autocorrelation times. We demonstrate that, given sufficient sampling, bootstrapping new trajectories allows for an accurate error estimate. In the presence of long autocorrelations, however, (Bayesian) bootstrapping of complete histograms yields a more reliable error estimate, whereas bootstrapping of new trajectories may underestimate the error. In addition, we emphasize that the incorporation of autocorrelations into WHAM reduces the bias from limited sampling, in particular, when computing periodic PMFs in inhomogeneous systems such as solvated lipid membranes or protein channels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
‘Improved parameters for the Martini coarse-grained protein force field’
de Jong, D. H., Singh, G., Bennett, W. F. D., Arnarez, C., Wassenaar, T. A., Schäfer, L. V., Periole, X., Tieleman, D. P., & Marrink, S. J. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300646g · Cited by 1,486
PtdIns(4,5)P2 stabilizes active states of GPCRs and enhances selectivity of G-protein coupling
Yen, H.-Y., Hoi, K. K., Liko, I., Hedger, G., Horrell, M. R., Song, W., Wu, D., Heine, P., Warne, T., Lee, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0325-6 · Cited by 284
Schneck, E., Horinek, D., & Netz, R. R. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp400790f · Cited by 115
Jeong, N., Park, S., Mahajan, S., Zhou, J., Blotevogel, J., Li, Y., Tong, T., & Chen, Y. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55320-9 · Cited by 98
Oleic Acid Phase Behavior from Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Janke, J. J., Bennett, W. F. D., & Tieleman, D. P. (2014) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la501962n · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Hub, J. S., de Groot, B. L., & van der Spoel, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-11-16
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3713-3720
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2141273392
- Cited by
- 1,686
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: g_wham—A Free Weighted Histogram Analysis Implementation Including Robust Error and Autocorrelation Estimates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct100494z
- The paper
- Hub, J. S., de Groot, B. L., & van der Spoel, D. (2010). g_wham—A Free Weighted Histogram Analysis Implementation Including Robust Error and Autocorrelation Estimates. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100494z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.