Cited by 53Protein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

A Transferable Nonbonded Pairwise Force Field to Model Zinc Interactions in Metalloproteins

Open access
Wu, Ruibo, Lu, Zhenyu, Cao, Zexing, Zhang, Yingkai·2011·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

Herein we introduce a novel practical strategy to overcome the well-known challenge of modeling the divalent zinc cation in metalloproteins. The main idea is to design short-long effective functions (SLEF) to describe charge interactions between the zinc ion and all other atoms. This SLEF approach has the following desired features: (1). It is pairwise, additive and compatible with widely used atomic pair-wise force fields for modeling biomolecules; (2). It only changes interactions between the zinc ion and other atoms, and does not affect force field parameters that model other interactions in the system; (3). It is a non-bonded model that is inherently capable to describe different zinc ligands and coordination modes. By optimizing two SLEF parameters as well as zinc vdW parameters through force matching based on Born-Oppenheimer ab initio QM/MM molecular dynamics simulations, we have successfully developed the first SLEF force field (SLEF1) to describe zinc interactions. Extensive molecular dynamics simulations of seven zinc enzyme systems with different coordination ligands and distinct chelation modes (4-,5-,6-fold), including the binuclear zinc active site, yielded zinc coordination numbers and binding distances in good agreement with the corresponding crystal structures as well as ab initio QM/MM MD results. This not only demonstrates the transferability and adequacy of the new SLEF1 force field in describing a variety of zinc proteins, but also indicates that this novel SLEF approach is a promising direction to explore for improving force field description of metal ion interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct100525r

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • That nonbonded description depends on assigned partial charges, so its accuracy is strongly tied to the charge model chosen.

    “This description relies on assignment of partial charges,11−13 and thus accuracy becomes strongly dependent on the choice of charge model.”

    From AutoDock4<sub>Zn</sub>: An Improved AutoDock Force Field for Small-Molecule Docking to Zinc Metalloproteins (2014) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Methods section defines the nonbonded SLEF interaction using the zinc charge and each other atom’s MM charge; the Discussion says its behavior varies with charge magnitude. The paper does not establish that accuracy is strongly dependent on the choice of charge model. Its Introduction instead identifies the conventional 1/r interaction form as the main deficiency of existing nonbonded models. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [23]Lin F Wang RX J Chem Theory Comput 2010 6 1852 1870 26615845
  2. [27]Pang YP Xu K El Yazal J Prendergast FG Protein Sci 2000 9 1857 1865 11106157 PMC2144454
  3. [36]Akin-Ojo O Song Y Wang F J Chem Phys 2008 129 064108 18715052
  4. [57]Corminboeuf C Hu P Tuckerman ME Zhang Y J Am Chem Soc 2006 128 4530 4531 16594663

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, R., Lu, Z., Cao, Z., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
Xiamen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Yingkai
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2010-12-23
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
433-443
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2049623642
Cited by
53
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM079223)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
zinc ions, metalloproteins, zinc metalloenzyme, force field parameterization, QM/MM molecular dynamics, force matching, transferable force fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review