The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NCIPLOT: A Program for Plotting Noncovalent Interaction Regions
Open accessAbstract
Non-covalent interactions hold the key to understanding many chemical, biological, and technological problems. Describing these non-covalent interactions accurately, including their positions in real space, constitutes a first step in the process of decoupling the complex balance of forces that define non-covalent interactions. Because of the size of macromolecules, the most common approach has been to assign van der Waals interactions (vdW), steric clashes (SC), and hydrogen bonds (HBs) based on pairwise distances between atoms according to their van der Waals radii. We recently developed an alternative perspective, derived from the electronic density: the Non-Covalent Interactions (NCI) index [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6498]. This index has the dual advantages of being generally transferable to diverse chemical applications and being very fast to compute, since it can be calculated from promolecular densities. Thus, NCI analysis is applicable to large systems, including proteins and DNA, where analysis of non-covalent interactions is of great potential value. Here, we describe the NCI computational algorithms and their implementation for the analysis and visualization of weak interactions, using both self-consistent fully quantum-mechanical, as well as promolecular, densities. A wide range of options for tuning the range of interactions to be plotted is also presented. To demonstrate the capabilities of our approach, several examples are given from organic, inorganic, solid state, and macromolecular chemistry, including cases where NCI analysis gives insight into unconventional chemical bonding. The NCI code and its manual are available for download at http://www.chem.duke.edu/~yang/software.htm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vannini, A., Volpari, C., Gallinari, P., Jones, P., Mattu, M., Carfí, A., De Francesco, R., Steinkühler, C., & Di Marco, S. (2007) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401047 · Cited by 256
Cited by
Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer
Lu, T., & Chen, F. (2012) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.22885 · Cited by 45,371
Critic2: A program for real-space analysis of quantum chemical interactions in solids
Otero-de-la-Roza, A., Johnson, E. R., & Luaña, V. (2014) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.10.026 · Cited by 835
Self-citationNajibi, A., & Goerigk, L. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00842 · Cited by 320
Pursuit of Noncovalent Interactions for Strategic Site-Selective Catalysis
Toste, F. D., Sigman, M. S., & Miller, S. J. (2017) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00613 · Cited by 257
Mutations along a TET2 active site scaffold stall oxidation at 5-hydroxymethylcytosine
Liu, M. Y., Torabifard, H., Crawford, D. J., DeNizio, J. E., Cao, X.-J., Garcia, B. A., Cisneros, G. A., & Kohli, R. M. (2017) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2250 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Contreras-García, J., Johnson, E. R., Keinan, S., Chaudret, R., Piquemal, J.-P., Beratan, D. N., & Yang, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-01-25
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 625-632
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W1966949133
- Cited by
- 4,076
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.