The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why are the Interaction Energies of Charge-Transfer Complexes Challenging for DFT?
Open accessAbstract
The description of ground state charge-transfer complexes is highly challenging. Illustrative examples include large overestimations of charge-transfer by local and semilocal density functional approximations as well as inaccurate binding energies. It is demonstrated here that standard density functionals fail to accurately describe interaction energies of charge-transfer complexes not only because of the missing long-range exchange as generally assumed but also as a result of the neglect of weak interactions. Thus, accounting for the missing van der Waals interactions is of key importance. These assertions, based on the evaluation of the extent of stabilization due to dispersion using both DFT coupled with our recent density-dependent dispersion correction (dDsC) and high-level ab initio computations, reflect the imperfect error-cancellation between the overestimation of charge-transfer and the missing long-range interactions. An in-depth energy decomposition analysis of an illustrative series of four small ambidentate molecules (HCN, HNC, HF, and ClF) bound together with NF3 provides the main conclusions, which are validated on a prototypical organic charge-transfer complex (i.e., tetrathiafulvalene-tetracyanoquinodimethane, TTF-TCNQ). We establish that the interaction energies for charge-transfer complexes can only be properly described when using well-balanced functionals such as PBE0-dDsC, M06-2X, and LC-BOP-LRD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections
Chai, J.-D., & Head-Gordon, M. (2008) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b810189b · Cited by 14,648
Conjugated Polymer-Based Organic Solar Cells
Günes, S., Neugebauer, H., & Sariciftci, N. S. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050149z · Cited by 6,279
Block-Localized Wavefunction (BLW) Method at the Density Functional Theory (DFT) Level
Mo, Y., Song, L., & Lin, Y. (2007) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp0724065 · Cited by 298
Cited by
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2017) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2017.1333644 · Cited by 2,307
Halogen Bonds: Benchmarks and Theoretical Analysis
Kozuch, S., & Martin, J. M. L. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct301064t · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinmann, S. N., Piemontesi, C., Delachat, A., & Corminboeuf, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-04-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1629-1640
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W1973069220
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why are the Interaction Energies of Charge-Transfer Complexes Challenging for DFT? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct200930x
- The paper
- Steinmann, S. N., Piemontesi, C., Delachat, A., & Corminboeuf, C. (2012). Why are the Interaction Energies of Charge-Transfer Complexes Challenging for DFT? Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct200930x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.