The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Druggability Assessment of Allosteric Proteins by Dynamics Simulations in the Presence of Probe Molecules
Open accessAbstract
Druggability assessment of a target protein has emerged in recent years as an important concept in hit-to-lead optimization. A reliable and physically relevant measure of druggability would allow informed decisions on the risk of investing in a particular target. Here, we define "druggability" as a quantitative estimate of binding sites and affinities for a potential drug acting on a specific protein target. In the present study, we describe a new methodology that successfully predicts the druggability and maximal binding affinity for a series of challenging targets, including those that function through allosteric mechanisms. Two distinguishing features of the methodology are (i) simulation of the binding dynamics of a diversity of probe molecules selected on the basis of an analysis of approved drugs and (ii) identification of druggable sites and estimation of corresponding binding affinities on the basis of an evaluation of the geometry and energetics of bound probe clusters. The use of the methodology for a variety of targets such as murine double mutant-2, protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1, vertebrate kinesin-5 (Eg5), and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase provides examples for which the method correctly captures the location and binding affinities of known drugs. It also provides insights into novel druggable sites and the target's structural changes that would accommodate, if not promote and stabilize, drug binding. Notably, the ability to identify high affinity spots even in challenging cases such as PTP1B or Eg5 shows promise as a rational tool for assessing the druggability of protein targets and identifying allosteric or novel sites for drug binding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
In Vivo Activation of the p53 Pathway by Small-Molecule Antagonists of MDM2
Vassilev, L. T., Vu, B. T., Graves, B., Carvajal, D., Podlaski, F., Filipovic, Z., Kong, N., Kammlott, U., Lukacs, C., Klein, C., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1092472 · Cited by 4,661
Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53
Haupt, Y., Maya, R., Kazaz, A., & Oren, M. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387296a0 · Cited by 4,506
Hopkins, A. L., & Groom, C. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd892 · Cited by 3,305
Structure of the MDM2 Oncoprotein Bound to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Transactivation Domain
Kussie, P. H., Gorina, S., Marechal, V., Elenbaas, B., Moreau, J., Levine, A. J., & Pavletich, N. P. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5289.948 · Cited by 2,206
Inhibiting the p53–MDM2 interaction: an important target for cancer therapy
Chène, P. (2003) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc991 · Cited by 765
Predicting Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energies to a Simple Model Site
Mobley, D. L., Graves, A. P., Chodera, J. D., McReynolds, A. C., Shoichet, B. K., & Dill, K. A. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.002 · Cited by 310
Potent and orally active small-molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction
Yu, S., Qin, D., Shangary, S., Chen, J., Wang, G., Ding, K., McEachern, D., Qiu, S., Nikolovska-Coleska, Z., Miller, R., et al. (2009) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm901400z · Cited by 180
Molecular basis of MAPK-activated protein kinase 2:p38 assembly
White, A., Pargellis, C. A., Studts, J. M., Werneburg, B. G., & Farmer, B. T. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701679104 · Cited by 111
Crystal Structure of the P38α-MAPKAP Kinase 2 Heterodimer
Haar, E. T., Prabakhar, P., Liu, X., & Lepre, C. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m611165200 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Next generation 3D pharmacophore modeling
Schaller, D., Šribar, D., Noonan, T., Deng, L., Nguyen, T. N., Pach, S., Machalz, D., Bermudez, M., & Wolber, G. (2020) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1468 · Cited by 269
Revealing Atomic-Level Mechanisms of Protein Allostery with Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Hertig, S., Latorraca, N. R., & Dror, R. O. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004746 · Cited by 118
Nordquist, E. B., Zhao, M., Kumar, A., & MacKerell, A. D. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01189 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakan, A., Nevins, N., Lakdawala, A. S., & Bahar, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-22
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2435-2447
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2007112624
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.