The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generating Efficient Quantum Chemistry Codes for Novel Architectures
Abstract
We describe an extension of our graphics processing unit (GPU) electronic structure program TeraChem to include atom-centered Gaussian basis sets with d angular momentum functions. This was made possible by a "meta-programming" strategy that leverages computer algebra systems for the derivation of equations and their transformation to correct code. We generate a multitude of code fragments that are formally mathematically equivalent, but differ in their memory and floating-point operation footprints. We then select between different code fragments using empirical testing to find the highest performing code variant. This leads to an optimal balance of floating-point operations and memory bandwidth for a given target architecture without laborious manual tuning. We show that this approach is capable of similar performance compared to our hand-tuned GPU kernels for basis sets with s and p angular momenta. We also demonstrate that mixed precision schemes (using both single and double precision) remain stable and accurate for molecules with d functions. We provide benchmarks of the execution time of entire self-consistent field (SCF) calculations using our GPU code and compare to mature CPU based codes, showing the benefits of the GPU architecture for electronic structure theory with appropriately redesigned algorithms. We suggest that the meta-programming and empirical performance optimization approach may be important in future computational chemistry applications, especially in the face of quickly evolving computer architectures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Automated empirical optimizations of software and the ATLAS project
Clint Whaley, R., Petitet, A., & Dongarra, J. J. (2001) · Parallel Computing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8191(00)00087-9 · Cited by 1,317
Cited by
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Recent Advances and Perspectives on Nonadiabatic Mixed Quantum–Classical Dynamics
Crespo-Otero, R., & Barbatti, M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 · Cited by 733
Villard, J., Kılıç, M., & Rothlisberger, U. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01078 · Cited by 19
Nemati, M., Farajzadeh, M. A., Altunay, N., Tuzen, M., Kaya, S., Maslov, M. M., & Afshar Mogaddam, M. R. (2023) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.135172 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Titov, A. V., Ufimtsev, I. S., Luehr, N., & Martinez, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-11-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 213-221
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W1979891593
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.