The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Density Matrix Embedding: A Strong-Coupling Quantum Embedding Theory
Open accessAbstract
We extend our density matrix embedding theory (DMET) [Phys. Rev. Lett.2012, 109, 186404] from lattice models to the full chemical Hamiltonian. DMET allows the many-body embedding of arbitrary fragments of a quantum system, even when such fragments are open systems and strongly coupled to their environment (e.g., by covalent bonds). In DMET, empirical approaches to strong coupling, such as link atoms or boundary regions, are replaced by a small, rigorous quantum bath designed to reproduce the entanglement between a fragment and its environment. We describe the theory and demonstrate its feasibility in strongly correlated hydrogen ring and grid models; these are not only beyond the scope of traditional embeddings but even challenge conventional quantum chemistry methods themselves. We find that DMET correctly describes the notoriously difficult symmetric dissociation of a 4 × 3 hydrogen atom grid, even when the treated fragments are as small as single hydrogen atoms. We expect that DMET will open up new ways of treating complex strongly coupled, strongly correlated systems in terms of their individual fragments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Density Matrix Renormalization Group in Quantum Chemistry
Chan, G. K.-L., & Sharma, S. (2011) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103338 · Cited by 822
Self-citation
Cited by
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G. H., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 · Cited by 1,031
The future of quantum computing with superconducting qubits
Bravyi, S., Dial, O., Gambetta, J. M., Gil, D., & Nazario, Z. (2022) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0082975 · Cited by 334
Baiardi, A., & Reiher, M. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5129672 · Cited by 306
Sun, Q., & Chan, G. K.-L. (2016) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00356 · Cited by 304
Self-citationQuantum computational quantification of protein–ligand interactions
Kirsopp, J. J. M., Di Paola, C., Manrique, D. Z., Krompiec, M., Greene‐Diniz, G., Guba, W., Meyder, A., Wolf, D., Strahm, M., & Muñoz Ramo, D. (2022) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.26975 · Cited by 59
RetractedError estimates for extrapolations with matrix-product states
Hubig, C., Haegeman, J., & Schollwöck, U. (2018) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.045125 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Knizia, G., & Chan, G. K.-L.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-02-21
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1428-1432
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2049719036
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.