Cited by 59Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

Error estimates for extrapolations with matrix-product states

Open access
Hubig, C., Haegeman, J., Schollwöck, U.·2018·Physical Review B

Abstract

We introduce an error measure for matrix-product states without requiring the relatively costly two-site density-matrix renormalization group (2DMRG). This error measure is based on an approximation of the full variance $\ensuremath{\langle}\ensuremath{\psi}|{(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{H}\ensuremath{-}E)}^{2}|\ensuremath{\psi}\ensuremath{\rangle}$. When applied to a series of matrix-product states at different bond dimensions obtained from a single-site density-matrix renormalization group (1DMRG) calculation, it allows for the extrapolation of observables towards the zero-error case representing the exact ground state of the system. The calculation of the error measure is split into a sequential part of cost equivalent to two calculations of $\ensuremath{\langle}\ensuremath{\psi}|\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{H}|\ensuremath{\psi}\ensuremath{\rangle}$ and a trivially parallelized part scaling like a single operator application in 2DMRG. The reliability of this error measure is demonstrated by four examples: the $L=30,S=1/2$ Heisenberg chain, the $L=50$ Hubbard chain, an electronic model with long-range Coulomb-like interactions, and the Hubbard model on a cylinder with a size of $10\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}4$. Extrapolation in this error measure is shown to be on par with extrapolation in the 2DMRG truncation error or the full variance $\ensuremath{\langle}\ensuremath{\psi}|{(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{H}\ensuremath{-}E)}^{2}|\ensuremath{\psi}\ensuremath{\rangle}$ at a fraction of the computational effort.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.97.045125

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A tangent space can be associated to every point of the MPS manifold.

    “Therefore, it makes sense to associate a tangent space [15] to every point |Ψ(A)〉.”

    From Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

  • A reduced version of the ansatz appeared earlier in Refs.[39,40], and it was explored in full generality in Refs.[15,41].

    “In the context of MPS, a reduced version of the ansatz appeared earlier in Refs.[39,40], but it was explored in full generality in Refs.[15,41].”

    From Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

  • The excitation ansatz can be systematically extended to capture larger and larger regions by introducing larger blocks.

    “The excitation ansatz can be systematically extended, however, in order to capture larger and larger regions.Instead of inserting a one-site tensor, one can introduce larger blocks, which leads to the ansatz [15,35]”

    From Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992). · DOI · Paper page
  2. U. Schollwöck, Ann. Phys. (NY) 326, 96 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  3. S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 70, 220506 (2004). · DOI
  4. S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 79, 220504 (2009). · DOI
  5. S. Depenbrock, I. P. McCulloch, and U. Schollwöck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 067201 (2012). · DOI
  6. S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Science 332, 1173 (2011). · DOI
  7. G. Ehlers, S. R. White, and R. M. Noack, Phys. Rev. B 95, 125125 (2017). · DOI
  8. J. Motruk, M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155139 (2016). · DOI
  9. A. Georges and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 45, 6479 (1992). · DOI
  10. M. Karski, C. Raas, and G. S. Uhrig, Phys. Rev. B 77, 075116 (2008). · DOI
  11. M. Ganahl, M. Aichhorn, H. G. Evertz, P. Thunström, K. Held, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. B 92, 155132 (2015). · DOI
  12. F. A. Wolf, A. Go, I. P. McCulloch, A. J. Millis, and U. Schollwöck, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041032 (2015). · DOI
  13. D. Bauernfeind, M. Zingl, R. Triebl, M. Aichhorn, and H. G. Evertz, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031013 (2017). · DOI
  14. G. Knizia and G. K.-L. Chan, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 1428 (2013). · DOI
  15. S. R. White and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9862 (1996). · DOI
  16. Y. Yamashita, N. Shibata, and K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. B 58, 9114 (1998). · DOI
  17. M. Andersson, M. Boman, and S. Östlund, Phys. Rev. B 59, 10493 (1999). · DOI
  18. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 220405 (2007). · DOI
  19. P. Chen, Z.-L. Xue, I. P. McCulloch, M.-C. Chung, C.-C. Huang, and S.-K. Yip, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 145301 (2015). · DOI
  20. I. Khait, P. Azaria, C. Hubig, U. Schollwöck, and A. Auerbach, arXiv:1710.04847. · arXiv
  21. O. Legeza and G. Fáth, Phys. Rev. B 53, 14349 (1996). · DOI
  22. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 72, 180403 (2005). · DOI
  23. J. P. F. LeBlanc, A. E. Antipov, F. Becca, I. W. Bulik, G. K.-L. Chan, C.-M. Chung, Y. Deng, M. Ferrero, T. M. Henderson, C. A. Jiménez-Hoyos, E. Kozik, X.-W. Liu, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof'ev, M. Qin, G. E. Scuseria, H. Shi, B. V. Svistunov, L. F. Tocchio, I. S. Tupitsyn, S. R. White, S. Zhang, B.-X. Zheng, Z. Zhu, and E. Gull (Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem), Phys. Rev. X 5, 041041 (2015). · DOI
  24. C. Hubig, I. P. McCulloch, U. Schollwöck, and F. A. Wolf, Phys. Rev. B 91, 155115 (2015). · DOI
  25. F. Dorfner, Ph.D. thesis, LMU Munich, 2017.
  26. E. M. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, New J. Phys. 12, 055026 (2010). · DOI
  27. G. K.-L. Chan, A. Keselman, N. Nakatani, Z. Li, and S. R. White, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 014102 (2016). · DOI
  28. C. Hubig, I. P. McCulloch, and U. Schollwöck, Phys. Rev. B 95, 035129 (2017). · DOI
  29. S. Paeckel, T. Köhler, and S. R. Manmana, SciPost Phys. 3, 035 (2017). · DOI
  30. F. Fröwis, V. Nebendahl, and W. Dür, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062337 (2010). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hubig, C., Haegeman, J., & Schollwöck, U.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2018-01-16
Volume
97
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W2767469526
Cited by
59
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
European Commission (715861)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
matrix product states, error estimation, extrapolation, bond dimension, energy variance, ground state, Heisenberg spin chain, Hubbard model, long-range Coulomb interaction, cylinder geometry, quantum many-body systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review