Error estimates for extrapolations with matrix-product states
Open accessAbstract
We introduce an error measure for matrix-product states without requiring the relatively costly two-site density-matrix renormalization group (2DMRG). This error measure is based on an approximation of the full variance $\ensuremath{\langle}\ensuremath{\psi}|{(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{H}\ensuremath{-}E)}^{2}|\ensuremath{\psi}\ensuremath{\rangle}$. When applied to a series of matrix-product states at different bond dimensions obtained from a single-site density-matrix renormalization group (1DMRG) calculation, it allows for the extrapolation of observables towards the zero-error case representing the exact ground state of the system. The calculation of the error measure is split into a sequential part of cost equivalent to two calculations of $\ensuremath{\langle}\ensuremath{\psi}|\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{H}|\ensuremath{\psi}\ensuremath{\rangle}$ and a trivially parallelized part scaling like a single operator application in 2DMRG. The reliability of this error measure is demonstrated by four examples: the $L=30,S=1/2$ Heisenberg chain, the $L=50$ Hubbard chain, an electronic model with long-range Coulomb-like interactions, and the Hubbard model on a cylinder with a size of $10\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}4$. Extrapolation in this error measure is shown to be on par with extrapolation in the 2DMRG truncation error or the full variance $\ensuremath{\langle}\ensuremath{\psi}|{(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{H}\ensuremath{-}E)}^{2}|\ensuremath{\psi}\ensuremath{\rangle}$ at a fraction of the computational effort.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A tangent space can be associated to every point of the MPS manifold.
“Therefore, it makes sense to associate a tangent space [15] to every point |Ψ(A)〉.”
From Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
A reduced version of the ansatz appeared earlier in Refs.[39,40], and it was explored in full generality in Refs.[15,41].
“In the context of MPS, a reduced version of the ansatz appeared earlier in Refs.[39,40], but it was explored in full generality in Refs.[15,41].”
From Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
The excitation ansatz can be systematically extended to capture larger and larger regions by introducing larger blocks.
“The excitation ansatz can be systematically extended, however, in order to capture larger and larger regions.Instead of inserting a one-site tensor, one can introduce larger blocks, which leads to the ansatz [15,35]”
From Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Entanglement in Quantum Critical Phenomena
Vidal, G., Latorre, J. I., Rico, E., & Kitaev, A. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.227902 · Cited by 2,793 · see citing works
Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states
Haegeman, J., Lubich, C., Oseledets, I., Vandereycken, B., & Verstraete, F. (2016) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.165116 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992). · DOI · Paper page
- U. Schollwöck, Ann. Phys. (NY) 326, 96 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 70, 220506 (2004). · DOI
- S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 79, 220504 (2009). · DOI
- S. Depenbrock, I. P. McCulloch, and U. Schollwöck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 067201 (2012). · DOI
- S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Science 332, 1173 (2011). · DOI
- G. Ehlers, S. R. White, and R. M. Noack, Phys. Rev. B 95, 125125 (2017). · DOI
- J. Motruk, M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155139 (2016). · DOI
- A. Georges and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 45, 6479 (1992). · DOI
- M. Karski, C. Raas, and G. S. Uhrig, Phys. Rev. B 77, 075116 (2008). · DOI
- M. Ganahl, M. Aichhorn, H. G. Evertz, P. Thunström, K. Held, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. B 92, 155132 (2015). · DOI
- F. A. Wolf, A. Go, I. P. McCulloch, A. J. Millis, and U. Schollwöck, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041032 (2015). · DOI
- D. Bauernfeind, M. Zingl, R. Triebl, M. Aichhorn, and H. G. Evertz, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031013 (2017). · DOI
- G. Knizia and G. K.-L. Chan, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 1428 (2013). · DOI
- S. R. White and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9862 (1996). · DOI
- Y. Yamashita, N. Shibata, and K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. B 58, 9114 (1998). · DOI
- M. Andersson, M. Boman, and S. Östlund, Phys. Rev. B 59, 10493 (1999). · DOI
- G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 220405 (2007). · DOI
- P. Chen, Z.-L. Xue, I. P. McCulloch, M.-C. Chung, C.-C. Huang, and S.-K. Yip, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 145301 (2015). · DOI
- I. Khait, P. Azaria, C. Hubig, U. Schollwöck, and A. Auerbach, arXiv:1710.04847. · arXiv
- O. Legeza and G. Fáth, Phys. Rev. B 53, 14349 (1996). · DOI
- S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 72, 180403 (2005). · DOI
- J. P. F. LeBlanc, A. E. Antipov, F. Becca, I. W. Bulik, G. K.-L. Chan, C.-M. Chung, Y. Deng, M. Ferrero, T. M. Henderson, C. A. Jiménez-Hoyos, E. Kozik, X.-W. Liu, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof'ev, M. Qin, G. E. Scuseria, H. Shi, B. V. Svistunov, L. F. Tocchio, I. S. Tupitsyn, S. R. White, S. Zhang, B.-X. Zheng, Z. Zhu, and E. Gull (Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem), Phys. Rev. X 5, 041041 (2015). · DOI
- C. Hubig, I. P. McCulloch, U. Schollwöck, and F. A. Wolf, Phys. Rev. B 91, 155115 (2015). · DOI
- F. Dorfner, Ph.D. thesis, LMU Munich, 2017.
- E. M. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, New J. Phys. 12, 055026 (2010). · DOI
- G. K.-L. Chan, A. Keselman, N. Nakatani, Z. Li, and S. R. White, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 014102 (2016). · DOI
- C. Hubig, I. P. McCulloch, and U. Schollwöck, Phys. Rev. B 95, 035129 (2017). · DOI
- S. Paeckel, T. Köhler, and S. R. Manmana, SciPost Phys. 3, 035 (2017). · DOI
- F. Fröwis, V. Nebendahl, and W. Dür, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062337 (2010). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance
Kim, Y., Eddins, A., Anand, S., Wei, K. X., van den Berg, E., Rosenblatt, S., Nayfeh, H., Wu, Y., Zaletel, M., Temme, K., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
Baiardi, A., & Reiher, M. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5129672 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states
Vanderstraeten, L., Haegeman, J., & Verstraete, F. (2019) · SciPost Physics Lecture Notes · doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.7 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
“[20] a slightly different error was proposed that avoids this numerical inaccuracy.”
BackgroundSelf-citationParallel time-dependent variational principle algorithm for matrix product states
Secular, P., Gourianov, N., Lubasch, M., Dolgov, S., Clark, S. R., & Jaksch, D. (2020) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.235123 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hubig, C., Haegeman, J., & Schollwöck, U.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-01-16
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W2767469526
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission (715861)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- matrix product states, error estimation, extrapolation, bond dimension, energy variance, ground state, Heisenberg spin chain, Hubbard model, long-range Coulomb interaction, cylinder geometry, quantum many-body systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review