The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Generalized Born Solvent Model Parameters for Protein Simulations
Open accessAbstract
The generalized Born (GB) model is one of the fastest implicit solvent models and it has become widely adopted for Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations. This speed comes with tradeoffs, and many reports in the literature have pointed out weaknesses with GB models. Because the quality of a GB model is heavily affected by empirical parameters used in calculating solvation energy, in this work we have refit these parameters for GB-Neck, a recently developed GB model, in order to improve the accuracy of both the solvation energy and effective radii calculations. The data sets used for fitting are significantly larger than those used in the past. Comparing to other pairwise GB models like GB-OBC and the original GB-Neck, the new GB model (GB-Neck2) has better agreement to Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) in terms of reproducing solvation energies for a variety of systems ranging from peptides to proteins. Secondary structure preferences are also in much better agreement with those obtained from explicit solvent MD simulations. We also obtain near-quantitative reproduction of experimental structure and thermal stability profiles for several model peptides with varying secondary structure motifs. Extension to non-protein systems will be explored in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Designing a 20-residue protein
Neidigh, J. W., Fesinmeyer, R. M., & Andersen, N. H. (2002) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb798 · Cited by 793
Genetic algorithms in chemometrics and chemistry: a review
Leardi, R. (2001) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.651 · Cited by 397
Critical Importance of Length-Scale Dependence in Implicit Modeling of Hydrophobic Interactions
Chen, J., & Brooks, C. L. (2007) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja068383+ · Cited by 47
Cited by
Evaluation of Predicted Protein–Protein Complexes by Binding Free Energy Simulations
Siebenmorgen, T., & Zacharias, M. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01022 · Cited by 59
Cryo-EM structure and B-factor refinement with ensemble representation
Beton, J. G., Mulvaney, T., Cragnolini, T., & Topf, M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44593-1 · Cited by 30
Bayesian optimization for ternary complex prediction (BOTCP)
Rao, A., Tunjic, T. M., Brunsteiner, M., Müller, M., Fooladi, H., Gasbarri, C., & Weber, N. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ailsci.2023.100072 · Cited by 25
Pham, G. H., Rana, A. S. J. B., Korkmaz, E. N., Trang, V. H., Cui, Q., & Strieter, E. R. (2016) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2834 · Cited by 21
Allosteric activation of the SPRTN protease by ubiquitin maintains genome stability
Dürauer, S., Kang, H.-S., Wiebeler, C., Machida, Y., Schnapka, D. S., Yaneva, D., Renz, C., Götz, M. J., Weickert, P., Major, A. C., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61224-z · Cited by 6
Murail, S., Sawmynaden, J., Zemirli, A., Jusot, M., Pietrucci, F., Chomilier, J., Tufféry, P., & Stratmann, D. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01123 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, H., Roe, D. R., & Simmerling, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-03-29
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2020-2034
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2329540625
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.