The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit Solvent Particle Mesh Ewald
Abstract
We present an implementation of explicit solvent all atom classical molecular dynamics (MD) within the AMBER program package that runs entirely on CUDA-enabled GPUs. First released publicly in April 2010 as part of version 11 of the AMBER MD package and further improved and optimized over the last two years, this implementation supports the three most widely used statistical mechanical ensembles (NVE, NVT, and NPT), uses particle mesh Ewald (PME) for the long-range electrostatics, and runs entirely on CUDA-enabled NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs), providing results that are statistically indistinguishable from the traditional CPU version of the software and with performance that exceeds that achievable by the CPU version of AMBER software running on all conventional CPU-based clusters and supercomputers. We briefly discuss three different precision models developed specifically for this work (SPDP, SPFP, and DPDP) and highlight the technical details of the approach as it extends beyond previously reported work [Götz et al., J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, DOI: 10.1021/ct200909j; Le Grand et al., Comp. Phys. Comm. 2013, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.022].We highlight the substantial improvements in performance that are seen over traditional CPU-only machines and provide validation of our implementation and precision models. We also provide evidence supporting our decision to deprecate the previously described fully single precision (SPSP) model from the latest release of the AMBER software package.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics
Plimpton, S. (1995) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 · Cited by 44,721
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- Grossfield A., 2011, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1808, 1868, 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.03.010 · DOI
- André S., 2006, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 14, 6314, 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.05.045 · DOI
- Harvey M. J., 2012, Drug Discovery Today, 17, 1059, 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.03.017 · DOI
- Zwier M. C., 2010, Curr. Opin. Pharmacol., 10, 745, 10.1016/j.coph.2010.09.008 · DOI
- Durrant J. D., 2011, BMC Biol., 71, 1
- Pérez A., 2011, Acc. Chem. Res., 45, 196, 10.1021/ar2001217 · DOI
- Wereszczynski J., 2012, Q. Rev. Biophys., 45, 1, 10.1017/S0033583511000096 · DOI
- Šponer J., 2012, Methods, 57, 25, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.04.005 · DOI
- Pierce L. C., 2012, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 8, 2997, 10.1021/ct300284c · DOI
- Skjevik r. A., 2012, J. Phys. Chem. B, 116, 11124, 10.1021/jp3059992 · DOI
- Dickson C. J., 2012, Soft Matter, 8, 9617, 10.1039/c2sm26007g · DOI
- Xu D., 2010, Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry, 6, 3
- Götz A. W., 2010, Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry, 6, 21
- Harvey M. J., 2012, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., 2, 734, 10.1002/wcms.1101 · DOI
- Garland M., 2008, IEEE Micro., 28, 13, 10.1109/MM.2008.57 · DOI
- Preis T., 2011, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top., 194, 87
- Pratx G., 2011, Med. Phys., 38, 2685, 10.1118/1.3578605 · DOI · Paper page
- Stone J. E., 2007, J. Comput. Chem., 28, 2618, 10.1002/jcc.20829 · DOI
- Case D., 2012, AMBER 12
- Salomon-Ferrer R., 2013, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., 3, 198, 10.1002/wcms.1121 · DOI
- van der Spoel D., 2005, J. Comput. Chem., 26, 1701, 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI · Paper page
- Hess B., 2008, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 4, 435, 10.1021/ct700301q · DOI
- Brooks B. R., 2009, J. Comput. Chem., 30, 1545, 10.1002/jcc.21287 · DOI
- Harvey M. J., 2009, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 5, 1632, 10.1021/ct9000685 · DOI
- Eastman P., 2013, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 9, 461, 10.1021/ct300857j · DOI
- Götz A. W., 2012, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 8, 1542, 10.1021/ct200909j · DOI
- Tironi I. G., 1995, J. Chem. Phys., 102, 5451, 10.1063/1.469273 · DOI
- Wu X., 2005, J. Chem. Phys., 122, 044107, 10.1063/1.1836733 · DOI
- Darden T., 1993, Chem. Phys., 98, 10089
- Essmann U., 1995, J. Chem. Phys., 103, 8577, 10.1063/1.470117 · DOI · Paper page
- Hockney R., 1988, Computer Simulation Using Particles, 10.1887/0852743920 · DOI
- Le Grand S., 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun., 184, 374, 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.022 · DOI
- Cornell W. D., 1995, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 5179, 10.1021/ja00124a002 · DOI
- Hornak V., 2006, Proteins, 65, 712, 10.1002/prot.21123 · DOI
- Harvey M. J., 2009, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 5, 2371, 10.1021/ct900275y · DOI
- Brown W. M., 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun., 183, 449, 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.10.012 · DOI
- Brown W. M., 2011, Comput. Phys. Commun., 182, 898, 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.021 · DOI
- Friedrichs M. S., 2009, J. Comput. Chem., 30, 864, 10.1002/jcc.21209 · DOI
- Eastman P., 2010, J. Comput. Chem., 31, 1268, 10.1002/jcc.21413 · DOI
- Hilbert D., 1891, Mathematische Annalen, 38, 459, 10.1007/BF01199431 · DOI
- Miyamoto S., 1992, J. Comput. Chem., 13, 952, 10.1002/jcc.540130805 · DOI
- 2009, A Message-Passing Interface Standard
- Case D. A., 2010, AMBER 11
- Bowers K. J., 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing
- Vijaykumar S., 1985, J. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 82, 3582, 10.1073/pnas.82.11.3582 · DOI
- Vijaykumar S., 1987, J. Mol. Bio., 194, 531, 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90679-6 · DOI
- Berendsen H. J. C., 1984, J. Chem. Phys., 81, 3684, 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Structure of hepcidin-bound ferroportin reveals iron homeostatic mechanisms
Billesbølle, C. B., Azumaya, C. M., Kretsch, R. C., Powers, A. S., Gonen, S., Schneider, S., Arvedson, T., Dror, R. O., Cheng, Y., & Manglik, A. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2668-z · Cited by 344
SARM1 is a metabolic sensor activated by an increased NMN/NAD+ ratio to trigger axon degeneration
Figley, M. D., Gu, W., Nanson, J. D., Shi, Y., Sasaki, Y., Cunnea, K., Malde, A. K., Jia, X., Luo, Z., Saikot, F. K., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.02.009 · Cited by 324
Structure and dynamics of the active human parathyroid hormone receptor-1
Zhao, L.-H., Ma, S., Sutkeviciute, I., Shen, D.-D., Zhou, X. E., de Waal, P. W., Li, C.-Y., Kang, Y., Clark, L. J., Jean-Alphonse, F. G., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav7942 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Salomon-Ferrer, R., Götz, A. W., Poole, D., Le Grand, S., & Walker, R. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-08-20
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3878-3888
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2313116527
- Cited by
- 3,372
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 229.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.