The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Benchmark Set of Transition-Metal Coordination Reactions for the Assessment of Density Functionals
Open accessAbstract
We present the WCCR10 data set of 10 ligand dissociation energies of large cationic transition metal complexes for the assessment of approximate exchange-correlation functionals. We analyze nine popular functionals, namely BP86, BP86-D3, B3LYP, B3LYP-D3, B97-D-D2, PBE, TPSS, PBE0, and TPSSh by mutual comparison and by comparison to experimental gas-phase data measured with well-known precision. The comparison of all calculated data reveals a large, system-dependent scattering of results with nonnegligible consequences for computational chemistry studies on transition metal compounds. Considering further the comparison with experimental results, the nonempirical functionals PBE and TPSS turn out to be among the best functionals for our reference data set. The deviation can be lowered further by including Hartree-Fock exchange. Accordingly, PBE0 and TPSSh are the two most accurate functionals for our test set, but also these functionals exhibit deviations from experimental results by up to 50 kJ mol(-1) for individual reactions. As an important result, we found no functional to be reliable for all reactions. Furthermore, for some of the ligand dissociation energies studied in this work, invoking semiempirical dispersion corrections yields results which increase the deviation from experimental results. This deviation increases further if structure optimization including such dispersion corrections is performed, although the contrary should be the case, pointing to the need to develop the currently available dispersion corrections further. Finally, we compare our results to other benchmark studies and highlight that the performance assessed for different density functionals depends significantly on the reference molecule set chosen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Molecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594
Cited by
Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers
Reiher, M., Wiebe, N., Svore, K. M., Wecker, D., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1619152114 · Cited by 745
Self-citationNandy, A., Duan, C., Taylor, M. G., Liu, F., Steeves, A. H., & Kulik, H. J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00347 · Cited by 358
Comprehensive Thermochemical Benchmark Set of Realistic Closed-Shell Metal Organic Reactions
Dohm, S., Hansen, A., Steinmetz, M., Grimme, S., & Checinski, M. P. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01183 · Cited by 286
Quantum computing enhanced computational catalysis
von Burg, V., Low, G. H., Häner, T., Steiger, D. S., Reiher, M., Roetteler, M., & Troyer, M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.14460 · Cited by 258
Self-citationMolecule‐Specific Uncertainty Quantification in Quantum Chemical Studies
Reiher, M. (2022) · Israel Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1002/ijch.202100101 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weymuth, T., Couzijn, E. P. A., Chen, P., & Reiher, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-07-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3092-3103
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2090576747
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Benchmark Set of Transition-Metal Coordination Reactions for the Assessment of Density Functionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct500248h
- The paper
- Weymuth, T., Couzijn, E. P. A., Chen, P., & Reiher, M. (2014). New Benchmark Set of Transition-Metal Coordination Reactions for the Assessment of Density Functionals. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct500248h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.