Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Benchmark Set of Transition-Metal Coordination Reactions for the Assessment of Density Functionals

Open access
Weymuth, Thomas, Couzijn, Erik P. A., Chen, Peter, Reiher, Markus·2014·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

We present the WCCR10 data set of 10 ligand dissociation energies of large cationic transition metal complexes for the assessment of approximate exchange-correlation functionals. We analyze nine popular functionals, namely BP86, BP86-D3, B3LYP, B3LYP-D3, B97-D-D2, PBE, TPSS, PBE0, and TPSSh by mutual comparison and by comparison to experimental gas-phase data measured with well-known precision. The comparison of all calculated data reveals a large, system-dependent scattering of results with nonnegligible consequences for computational chemistry studies on transition metal compounds. Considering further the comparison with experimental results, the nonempirical functionals PBE and TPSS turn out to be among the best functionals for our reference data set. The deviation can be lowered further by including Hartree-Fock exchange. Accordingly, PBE0 and TPSSh are the two most accurate functionals for our test set, but also these functionals exhibit deviations from experimental results by up to 50 kJ mol(-1) for individual reactions. As an important result, we found no functional to be reliable for all reactions. Furthermore, for some of the ligand dissociation energies studied in this work, invoking semiempirical dispersion corrections yields results which increase the deviation from experimental results. This deviation increases further if structure optimization including such dispersion corrections is performed, although the contrary should be the case, pointing to the need to develop the currently available dispersion corrections further. Finally, we compare our results to other benchmark studies and highlight that the performance assessed for different density functionals depends significantly on the reference molecule set chosen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct500248h

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Weymuth, T., Couzijn, E. P. A., Chen, P., & Reiher, M.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2014-07-03
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
3092-3103
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2090576747
Cited by
233
References
2
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Benchmark Set of Transition-Metal Coordination Reactions for the Assessment of Density Functionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct500248h
The paper
Weymuth, T., Couzijn, E. P. A., Chen, P., & Reiher, M. (2014). New Benchmark Set of Transition-Metal Coordination Reactions for the Assessment of Density Functionals. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct500248h

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.