The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the Accuracy Limits of Local Pair Natural Orbital Coupled-Cluster Theory
Abstract
The domain based local pair natural orbital coupled cluster method with single-, double-, and perturbative triple excitations (DLPNO–CCSD(T)) is an efficient quantum chemical method that allows for coupled cluster calculations on molecules with hundreds of atoms. Because coupled-cluster theory is the method of choice if high-accuracy is needed, DLPNO–CCSD(T) is very promising for large-scale chemical application. However, the various approximations that have to be introduced in order to reach near linear scaling also introduce limited deviations from the canonical results. In the present work, we investigate how far the accuracy of the DLPNO–CCSD(T) method can be pushed for chemical applications. We also address the question at which additional computational cost improvements, relative to the previously established default scheme, come. To answer these questions, a series of benchmark sets covering a broad range of quantum chemical applications including reaction energies, hydrogen bonds, and other noncovalent interactions, conformer energies, and a prototype organometallic problem were selected. An accuracy of 1 kcal/mol or better can readily be obtained for all data sets using the default truncation scheme, which corresponds to the stated goal of the original implementation. Tightening of the three thresholds that control DLPNO leads to mean absolute errors and standard deviations from the canonical results of less than 0.25 kcal/mol (<1 kJ/mol). The price one has then to pay is an increased computational time by a factor close to 3. The applicability of the method is shown to be independent of the nature of the reaction. On the basis of the careful analysis of the results, three different sets of truncation thresholds (termed “LoosePNO”, “NormalPNO”, and “TightPNO”) have been chosen for “black box” use of DLPNO–CCSD(T). This will allow users of the method to optimally balance performance and accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunning, T. H. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456153 · Cited by 31,648
Weigend, F., & Ahlrichs, R. (2005) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b508541a · Cited by 30,598
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Boys, S. F., & Bernardi, F. (1970) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268977000101561 · Cited by 22,188
Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions
Kendall, R. A., Dunning, T. H., & Harrison, R. J. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.462569 · Cited by 15,496
Neese, F. (2012) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.81 · Cited by 13,466
Self-citationCoupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry
Bartlett, R. J., & Musiał, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 · Cited by 3,343
Basis-set convergence of correlated calculations on water
Helgaker, T., Klopper, W., Koch, H., & Noga, J. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.473863 · Cited by 2,550
Basis-set convergence in correlated calculations on Ne, N2, and H2O
Halkier, A., Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., Klopper, W., Koch, H., Olsen, J., & Wilson, A. K. (1998) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00111-0 · Cited by 2,192
Goerigk, L., & Grimme, S. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c0cp02984j · Cited by 2,004
Cited by
Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0
Neese, F. (2022) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1606 · Cited by 4,963
Self-citationBenchmark Calculations of Interaction Energies in Noncovalent Complexes and Their Applications
Řezáč, J., & Hobza, P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00526 · Cited by 455
Christensen, A. S., Kubař, T., Cui, Q., & Elstner, M. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00584 · Cited by 446
Saitow, M., Becker, U., Riplinger, C., Valeev, E. F., & Neese, F. (2017) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4981521 · Cited by 423
Self-citationCarbon Tunneling in the Automerization of Cyclo[18]carbon
Nandi, A., Solel, E., & Kozuch, S. (2020) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.201904929 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Liakos, D. G., Sparta, M., Kesharwani, M. K., Martin, J. M. L., & Neese, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-03-20
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1525-1539
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W1976774792
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 24.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the Accuracy Limits of Local Pair Natural Orbital Coupled-Cluster Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct501129s
- The paper
- Liakos, D. G., Sparta, M., Kesharwani, M. K., Martin, J. M. L., & Neese, F. (2015). Exploring the Accuracy Limits of Local Pair Natural Orbital Coupled-Cluster Theory. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct501129s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.