The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybrid Density Functional Methods Empirically Optimized for the Computation of 13C and 1H Chemical Shifts in Chloroform Solution
Abstract
Two hybrid generalized-gradient approximation density functionals, WC04 and WP04, are optimized for the prediction of (13)C and (1)H chemical shifts, respectively, using a training set of 43 molecules in chloroform solution. Tests on molecules not included in the training set, namely six stereoisomeric methylcyclohexanols and a β-lactam antibiotic, indicate the models to be robust and moreover to provide results more accurate than those from equivalent B3LYP, PBE1, or mPW1PW91 calculations, particularly for the prediction of downfield resonances in nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. However, linear regression of the B3LYP, PBE1, and mPW1PW91 predicted values on the experimental data improves the accuracy of those models so that they are comparable to WC04 and WP04.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Cited by
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2017) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2017.1333644 · Cited by 2,307
Lodewyk, M. W., Siebert, M. R., & Tantillo, D. J. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200106v · Cited by 1,287
Willoughby, P. H., Jansma, M. J., & Hoye, T. R. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.042 · Cited by 404
Self-citationBorlido, P., Schmidt, J., Huran, A. W., Tran, F., Marques, M. A. L., & Botti, S. (2020) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00360-0 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiitala, K. W., Hoye, T. R., & Cramer, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-06-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1085-1092
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2122871402
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
