The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Density Functionals for Noncovalent Interaction Energies of Biological Importance
Abstract
Forty density functionals and one wavefunction method are assessed against a recently published database of accurate noncovalent interaction energies of biological importance. The comparison shows that two newly developed density functional theory (DFT) methods, PWB6K and M05-2X, give the best performance for this benchmark database of 22 noncovalent complexes, including both hydrogen-bonding and dispersion-dominated complexes. In contrast, the more popular B3LYP and PBEh functionals fail to describe the interactions in the dispersion-dominated complexes. The local spin density approximation and BHandH functionals give good performance for dispersion-dominated interactions at the expense of a large error for hydrogen bonding. PWB6K and M05-2X constitute a new generation of DFT methods based on simultaneously optimized exchange and correlation functionals that include kinetic energy density in both the exchange and correlation functional, and the present study confirms that they have greatly improved performance for noncovalent interactions as compared to previous DFT methods. We interpret this as being due to an improved treatment of medium-range correlation effects by the exchange-correlation functional. We recommend the PWB6K and M05-2X methods for investigating large biological systems and soft materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2008) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x · Cited by 30,302
Self-citationDensity functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b907148b · Cited by 1,648
Self-citationAromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition: Energetics and Structures
Salonen, L. M., Ellermann, M., & Diederich, F. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201007560 · Cited by 1,539
S66: A Well-balanced Database of Benchmark Interaction Energies Relevant to Biomolecular Structures
Řezáč, J., Riley, K. E., & Hobza, P. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct2002946 · Cited by 1,019
Riley, K. E., Pitoňák, M., Jurečka, P., & Hobza, P. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1000173 · Cited by 759
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-12-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 289-300
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2124835719
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.