The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biomolecules Using NMR Spin Relaxation as Benchmarks: Application to the AMBER99SB Force Field
Abstract
Biological function of biomolecules is accompanied by a wide range of motional behavior. Accurate modeling of dynamics by molecular dynamics (MD) computer simulations is therefore a useful approach toward the understanding of biomolecular function. NMR spin relaxation measurements provide rigorous benchmarks for assessing important aspects of MD simulations, such as the amount and time scales of conformational space sampling, which are intimately related to the underlying molecular mechanics force field. Until recently, most simulations produced trajectories that exhibited too much dynamics particularly in flexible loop regions. Recent modifications made to the backbone φ and ψ torsion angle potentials of the AMBER and CHARMM force fields indicate that these changes produce more realistic molecular dynamics behavior. To assess the consequences of these changes, we performed a series of 5-20 ns molecular dynamics trajectories of human ubiquitin using the AMBER99 and AMBER99SB force fields for different conditions and water models and compare the results with NMR experimental backbone N-H S(2) order parameters. A quantitative analysis of the trajectories shows significantly improved agreement with experimental NMR data for the AMBER99SB force field as compared to AMBER99. Because NMR spin relaxation data (T1, T2, NOE) reflect the combined effects of spatial and temporal fluctuations of bond vectors, it is found that comparison of experimental and back-calculated NMR spin-relaxation data provides a more objective way of assessing the quality of the trajectory than order parameters alone. Analysis of a key mobile β-hairpin in ubiquitin demonstrates that the dynamics of mobile sites are not only reduced by the modified force field, but the extent of motional correlations between amino acids is also markedly diminished.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Lipari, G., & Szabo, A. (1982) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00381a009 · Cited by 3,777
Cited by
ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB
Maier, J. A., Martinez, C., Kasavajhala, K., Wickstrom, L., Hauser, K. E., & Simmerling, C. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255 · Cited by 10,830
CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data
Huang, J., & MacKerell, A. D. (2013) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.23354 · Cited by 4,430
Optimized Molecular Dynamics Force Fields Applied to the Helix−Coil Transition of Polypeptides
Best, R. B., & Hummer, G. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp901540t · Cited by 833
Protein Allostery and Conformational Dynamics
Guo, J., & Zhou, H.-X. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00590 · Cited by 484
Xia, J., Deng, N.-J., & Levy, R. M. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp400797y · Cited by 29
Photocobilins integrate B12 and bilin photochemistry for enzyme control
Zhang, S., Jeffreys, L. N., Poddar, H., Yu, Y., Liu, C., Patel, K., Johannissen, L. O., Zhu, L., Cliff, M. J., Yan, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46995-1 · Cited by 13
Lesovoy, D., Roshchin, K., Sala, B. M., Sandalova, T., Achour, A., Agback, T., Orekhov, V., & Agback, P. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.02.07.637034 · Cited by 6
Lesovoy, D., Roshchin, K., Sala, B. M., Sandalova, T., Achour, A., Agback, T., Agback, P., & Orekhov, V. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26188917 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Showalter, S. A., & Brüschweiler, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-03-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 961-975
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2015805666
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.