Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of Orbital-Optimized, Spin-Component Scaled Second-Order Many-Body Perturbation Theory for Thermochemistry and Kinetics

Neese, Frank, Schwabe, Tobias, Kossmann, Simone, Schirmer, Birgitta, Grimme, Stefan·2009·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

An efficient implementation of the orbital-optimized second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (OO-MP2) within the resolution of the identity (RI) approximation is reported. Both conventional MP2 and spin-component scaled (SCS-MP2) variants are considered, and an extensive numerical investigation of the accuracy of these approaches is presented. This work is closely related to earlier work of Lochan, R. C.; Head-Gordon, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126. Orbital optimization is achieved by making the Hylleraas functional together with the energy of the reference determinant stationary with respect to variations of the double excitation amplitudes and the molecular orbital rotation parameters. A simple iterative scheme is proposed that usually leads to convergence within 5-15 iterations. The applicability of the method to larger molecules (up to ∼1000-2000 basis functions) is demonstrated. The numerical results show that OO-SCS-MP2 is a major improvement in electronically complicated situations, such as represented by radicals or by transition states where spin contamination often greatly deteriorates the quality of the conventional MP2 and SCS-MP2 methods. The OO-(SCS-)MP2 approach reduces the error by a factor of 3-5 relative to the standard (SCS-)MP2. For closed-shell main group elements, no significant improvement in the accuracy relative to the already excellent SCS-MP2 method is observed. In addition, the problems of all MP2 variants with 3d transition-metal complexes are not solved by orbital optimization. The close relationship of the OO-MP2 method to the approximate second-order coupled cluster method (CC2) is pointed out. Both methods have comparable computational requirements. Thus, the OO-MP2 method emerges as a very useful tool for computational quantum chemistry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct9003299

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Neese, F., Schwabe, T., Kossmann, S., Schirmer, B., & Grimme, S.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2009-10-12
Volume
5
Issue
11
Pages
3060-3073
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2066057880
Cited by
241
References
2
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.