Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integration Grid Errors for Meta-GGA-Predicted Reaction Energies: Origin of Grid Errors for the M06 Suite of Functionals

Open access
Wheeler, Steven E., Houk, K. N.·2010·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

We have assessed integration grid errors arising from the use of popular DFT quadrature schemes for a set of 34 organic reaction energies. The focus is primarily on M05-2X and the M06 suite of functionals (M06-L, M06, M06-2X, and M06-HF). M05-2X, M06, and M06-2X outperform popular older DFT functionals for the reaction energies studied, and offer accuracies comparable to results from perturbative hybrid DFT functionals. However, these new functionals are more sensitive to the choice of quadrature grid than previous generations of DFT functionals. Errors in predicted reaction energies arising from the use of the popular SG-1 grid, which is the default in the Q-Chem package, are significant. In particular, M06-HF reaction energies computed with the SG-1 grid exhibit errors ranging from -6.7 to 3.2 kcal mol(-1) relative to results computed with a very fine integration grid. This grid-sensitivity is not a problem for meta-GGA functionals in general, but is instead due to the specific functional forms used in these functionals. The large grid errors are traced to the kinetic energy density enhancement factor utilized in the exchange component of the M05-2X and M06 functionals. This term contains empirically adjusted parameters that are of large magnitude for all of the M06 functionals and for M06-HF in particular. The product of these large constants with modest integration errors for the kinetic energy density results in very large errors in individual contributions to the exchange energy. This gives rise to the troubling large errors exhibited by these functionals for certain integration grids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct900639j

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Wheeler, S. E., & Houk, K. N.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2010-01-15
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
395-404
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W1999132213
Cited by
359
References
1
FWCI
18.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integration Grid Errors for Meta-GGA-Predicted Reaction Energies: Origin of Grid Errors for the M06 Suite of Functionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct900639j
The paper
Wheeler, S. E., & Houk, K. N. (2010). Integration Grid Errors for Meta-GGA-Predicted Reaction Energies: Origin of Grid Errors for the M06 Suite of Functionals. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct900639j

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.