Cited by 23Various Chemistry Research TopicsThermal and Kinetic AnalysisChemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure

Old Rule of Thumb and the Arrhenius Equation

Leenson, I. A.·1999·Journal of Chemical Education

Abstract

The empirical rule (doubling of the reaction rate upon every 10° increase in temperature) is discussed on the basis of the Arrhenius equation and experimental data. A graph is plotted that shows the applicability limits of the empirical rule in terms of activation energies and temperatures. The historical origin of the rule mentioned is briefly discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ed076p1459

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leenson, I. A.
Affiliations
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Corresponding author
Leenson, I. A.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
1999-10
Volume
76
Issue
10
Pages
1459
ISSN
  • 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-1328
OpenAlex
W1996949267
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Chemical Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
Keywords
rules of thumb, Arrhenius equation, reaction rate, temperature dependence, activation energy, history of chemistry, reaction kinetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review