Cited by 49Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesCoal Properties and UtilizationThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Co-liquefaction of Micro Algae with Coal Using Coal Liquefaction Catalysts

Ikenaga, Na-oki, Ueda, Chiyo, Matsui, Takao, Ohtsuki, Munetaka, Suzuki, Toshimitsu·2001·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Co-liquefaction of micro algae (Chlorella, Spirulina, and Littorale) with coal (Australian Yallourn brown coal and Illinois No. 6 coal) was carried out under pressurized H 2 in 1-methylnaphthalene at 350−400 °C for 60 min with various catalysts. Co-liquefaction of Chlorella with Yallourn coal was successfully achieved with excess sulfur to iron (S/Fe = 4), where sufficient amount of Fe 1 - x S, which is believed to be the active species in the coal liquefaction, was produced. The conversion and the yield of the hexane-soluble fraction were close to the values calculated from the additivity of the product yields of the respective homo-reactions. In the reaction with a one-to-one mixture of Chlorella and Yallourn coal, 99.8% of conversion and 65.5% of hexane-soluble fraction were obtained at 400 °C with Fe(CO) 5 at S/Fe = 4. When Littorale and Spirulina were used as micro algae, a similar tendency was observed with the iron catalyst. On the other hand, in the co-liquefaction with Illinois No. 6 coal, which is known to contain a large amount of sulfur in the form of catalytically active pyrite, the oil yield in the co-liquefaction was close to the additivity of the respective reaction with Fe(CO) 5 −S, even at S/Fe = 2. Ru 3 (CO) 12 was also effective for the co-liquefaction of micro algae with coal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef000129u

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ikenaga, N.-O., Ueda, C., Matsui, T., Ohtsuki, M., & Suzuki, T.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kansai University, Suita, Osaka 564-8680, Japan
  • Kansai University (JP)
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2001-01-25
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
350-355
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W1966277533
Cited by
49
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Energy & Fuels (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Coal Properties and Utilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
co-liquefaction, microalgae, coal liquefaction, Chlorella, Spirulina, iron catalysts, iron pentacarbonyl, ruthenium catalysts, Ru3(CO)12, pyrite, lignite, Illinois No. 6 coal, Yallourn coal, hydrogenation, bio-oil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review