The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of PM2.5 and PM10 Apportionment for Fossil Fuel Combustion and Other Sources by the Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model
Abstract
This review examines how the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) receptor model has been used to quantify source contributions from fossil fuel combustion and other sources to ambient concentrations of PM 2.5 and PM 10 for urban and regional scales. Nonfossil fuel sources, such as fugitive dust, cooking, vegetative burning, and natural or human-caused biogenics must be considered together with fossil-fuel sources in a CMB analysis to obtain closure for PM 2.5 and PM 10 mass. CMB analyses in 22 different studies have found fossil fuel combustion to be a large contributor to PM 2.5 and PM 10 concentrations, with most of the primary contributions originating form diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicle exhaust. Primary contributions from ducted sources, such as coal- and oil-fired power stations, are negligible when these facilities have been modernized with effective pollution controls, but they have been shown to be large contributors without these controls. Secondary sulfates and nitrates from fossil fuel combustion are recognized, but their attribution to specific precursor gas emitters is uncertain using either the CMB or source-oriented chemical transport models. Using source and receptor models together improves source contribution estimates and the confidence in those estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5721 · Cited by 4,944
Rogge, W. F., Hildemann, L. M., Mazurek, M. A., Cass, G. R., & Simoneit, B. R. T. (1993) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00041a007 · Cited by 1,421
NIOSH manual of analytical methods.
(1981) · doi:10.26616/nioshpub82100 · Cited by 1,362
Source apportionment of airborne particulate matter using organic compounds as tracers
Schauer, J. J., Rogge, W. F., Hildemann, L. M., Mazurek, M. A., Cass, G. R., & Simoneit, B. R. T. (1996) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/1352-2310(96)00085-4 · Cited by 1,343
Rogge, W. F., Hildemann, L. M., Mazurek, M. A., Cass, G. R., & Simoneit, B. R. T. (1993) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00046a019 · Cited by 785
Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., & Houck, J. E. (2001) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00171-5 · Cited by 624
Self-citationFine Particle and Gaseous Emission Rates from Residential Wood Combustion
McDonald, J. D., Zielinska, B., Fujita, E. M., Sagebiel, J. C., Chow, J. C., & Watson, J. G. (2000) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9909632 · Cited by 607
Self-citationRogge, W. F., Hildemann, L. M., Mazurek, M. A., Cass, G. R., & Simoneit, B. R. T. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es960930b · Cited by 576
Schauer, J. J., & Cass, G. R. (2000) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es981312t · Cited by 560
Review of volatile organic compound source apportionment by chemical mass balance
Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., & Fujita, E. M. (2001) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00461-1 · Cited by 533
Self-citation
Cited by
Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171 · Cited by 6,385
Visibility: Science and Regulation
Watson, J. G. (2002) · Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · doi:10.1080/10473289.2002.10470813 · Cited by 929
Self-citationPM 2.5 in China: Measurements, sources, visibility and health effects, and mitigation
Pui, D. Y. H., Chen, S.-C., & Zuo, Z. (2014) · Particuology · doi:10.1016/j.partic.2013.11.001 · Cited by 817
Abdullahi, K. L., Delgado-Saborit, J. M., & Harrison, R. M. (2013) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.061 · Cited by 565
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Kuhns, H., Etyemezian, V., Lowenthal, D. H., Crow, D., Kohl, S. D., Engelbrecht, J. P., & Green, M. C. (2004) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.07.004 · Cited by 543
Self-citationReview on recent progress in observations, source identifications and countermeasures of PM2.5
Liang, C.-S., Duan, F.-K., He, K.-B., & Ma, Y.-L. (2016) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.016 · Cited by 375
Liu, J. C., Wilson, A., Mickley, L. J., Dominici, F., Ebisu, K., Wang, Y., Sulprizio, M. P., Peng, R. D., Yue, X., Son, J.-Y., et al. (2017) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000556 · Cited by 303
Receptor modeling application framework for particle source apportionment
Watson, J. G., Zhu, T., Chow, J. C., Engelbrecht, J., Fujita, E. M., & Wilson, W. E. (2002) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00243-6 · Cited by 299
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chow, J. C., & Watson, J. G.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-01-19
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 222-260
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W1987051884
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
