The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fast Pyrolysis of Forestry Residue. 2. Physicochemical Composition of Product Liquid
Abstract
In this second article on fuel oil, use of forestry residue pyrolysis liquids, their physicochemical properties, and the behavior of these liquids are described. Understanding of the chemical composition of forestry residue liquids enables the selection of correct handling and storage conditions. Forestry residue is one of the most viable biomass feedstocks for liquid production in Northern softwood forest zone. A 10−25 wt % top phase with a high heating value is produced from forestry residue due to the high content of extractives and low water content. However, it has high solid and ash contents. The main product, bottom phase, is similar to bark-free wood pyrolysis liquid: volatile acids 8−10 wt %; aldehydes and ketones 10−15 wt %; water 25−30 wt %; “sugar constituents” 30−35 wt %; water-insoluble, mainly lignin-based constituents 15−20 wt %; and extractives (2−6 wt %). Its physical properties (water 28 wt %, pH 3.0, viscosity at 40 °C 15 cSt, LHV 14 MJ/kg, solids < 0.05 wt %), making it suitable for fuel oil use. The solids content is typically lower than in pine liquids. Needles and bark in forestry residue, especially in fresh green feedstock, yields high alkali metal (400−1000 mg/kg), ash (0.1−0.2 wt %), and nitrogen (0.1−0.4 wt %) contents of the liquid compared to pine (50 mg/kg, 0.02−0.03 wt %, < 0.1 wt %, respectively) liquids. This results in higher NO x and particulates emissions in combustion. In pyrolysis of forestry residue attention should be paid on solids/alkali removal and decrease in nitrogen content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review
Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., & Steele, P. H. (2006) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef0502397 · Cited by 5,663
Fast pyrolysis of microalgae to produce renewable fuels
Miao, X., Wu, Q., & Yang, C. (2004) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2003.11.004 · Cited by 568
Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oils from Wood and Agricultural Residues
Oasmaa, A., Solantausta, Y., Arpiainen, V., Kuoppala, E., & Sipilä, K. (2010) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef901107f · Cited by 407
Self-citationA review on pyrolysis of protein-rich biomass: Nitrogen transformation
Leng, L., Yang, L., Chen, J., Leng, S., Li, H., Li, H., Yuan, X., Zhou, W., & Huang, H. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123801 · Cited by 259
de Miguel Mercader, F., Groeneveld, M. J., Kersten, S. R. A., Geantet, C., Toussaint, G., Way, N. W. J., Schaverien, C. J., & Hogendoorn, K. J. A. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00523a · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Oasmaa, A., Kuoppala, E., & Solantausta, Y.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-02-28
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 433-443
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2046566268
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast Pyrolysis of Forestry Residue. 2. Physicochemical Composition of Product Liquid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef020206g
- The paper
- Oasmaa, A., Kuoppala, E., & Solantausta, Y. (2003). Fast Pyrolysis of Forestry Residue. 2. Physicochemical Composition of Product Liquid. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef020206g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.