Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 754

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Selection of Oxygen Carriers for Chemical-Looping Combustion

Adánez, J., de Diego, L. F., García-Labiano, F., Gayán, P., Abad, A., Palacios, J. M.·2004·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) has been suggested as an energetically efficient method for capture of carbon dioxide from the combustion of fuel gas. This technique involves the use of an oxygen carrier that transfers oxygen from the air to the fuel, preventing direct contact between them. The oxygen carrier is composed of a metal oxide as an oxygen source, and an inert as a binder for increasing the mechanical strength of the carrier. In this work, 240 samples composed of 40−80% of Cu, Fe, Mn, or Ni oxides on Al 2 O 3, sepiolite, SiO 2, TiO 2, or ZrO 2 were prepared by mechanical mixing as cylindrical extrudates. The samples were sintered at four temperatures between 950 and 1300 °C. The effects of the chemical nature and composition of the carrier and the sintering temperature were investigated by reactivity tests in a thermogravimetric analyzer using CH 4 as fuel, and the mechanical strength of the solids. On the basis of these properties, the most promising carriers to be used in a CLC system were selected. The best Cu-based oxygen carriers were those prepared using SiO 2 or TiO 2 as inert, and sintered at 950 °C. Among the Fe-based oxygen carriers, those prepared with Al 2 O 3 and ZrO 2 as inerts showed the best behavior. ZrO 2 was the best inert for those Mn-based oxygen carriers. Finally, TiO 2 was the best inert for those Ni-based oxygen carriers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef0301452

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Adánez, J., de Diego, L. F., García-Labiano, F., Gayán, P., Abad, A., & Palacios, J. M.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2004-01-09
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
371-377
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W1980854042
Cited by
754
References
0
FWCI
14.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.