The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selection of Oxygen Carriers for Chemical-Looping Combustion
Abstract
Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) has been suggested as an energetically efficient method for capture of carbon dioxide from the combustion of fuel gas. This technique involves the use of an oxygen carrier that transfers oxygen from the air to the fuel, preventing direct contact between them. The oxygen carrier is composed of a metal oxide as an oxygen source, and an inert as a binder for increasing the mechanical strength of the carrier. In this work, 240 samples composed of 40−80% of Cu, Fe, Mn, or Ni oxides on Al 2 O 3, sepiolite, SiO 2, TiO 2, or ZrO 2 were prepared by mechanical mixing as cylindrical extrudates. The samples were sintered at four temperatures between 950 and 1300 °C. The effects of the chemical nature and composition of the carrier and the sintering temperature were investigated by reactivity tests in a thermogravimetric analyzer using CH 4 as fuel, and the mechanical strength of the solids. On the basis of these properties, the most promising carriers to be used in a CLC system were selected. The best Cu-based oxygen carriers were those prepared using SiO 2 or TiO 2 as inert, and sintered at 950 °C. Among the Fe-based oxygen carriers, those prepared with Al 2 O 3 and ZrO 2 as inerts showed the best behavior. ZrO 2 was the best inert for those Mn-based oxygen carriers. Finally, TiO 2 was the best inert for those Ni-based oxygen carriers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies
Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 · Cited by 3,198
Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations—a review
Hossain, M. M., & de Lasa, H. I. (2008) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2008.05.028 · Cited by 961
Review of recent advances in carbon dioxide separation and capture
Kenarsari, S. D., Yang, D., Jiang, G., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Russell, A. G., Wei, Q., & Fan, M. (2013) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c3ra43965h · Cited by 784
Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling for combustion of solid fuels
Mattisson, T., Lyngfelt, A., & Leion, H. (2009) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.06.002 · Cited by 631
Combination of ionic liquids with membrane technology: A new approach for CO2 separation
Dai, Z., Noble, R. D., Gin, D. L., Zhang, X., & Deng, L. (2016) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.060 · Cited by 559
Biomass-based chemical looping technologies: the good, the bad and the future
Zhao, X., Zhou, H., Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Park, A.-H. A., Fennell, P. S., Shen, L., & Fan, L.-S. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee03718f · Cited by 558
Opportunities and challenges in carbon dioxide capture
Spigarelli, B. P., & Kawatra, S. K. (2013) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2013.03.002 · Cited by 512
Abanades, J. C., Arias, B., Lyngfelt, A., Mattisson, T., Wiley, D. E., Li, H., Ho, M. T., Mangano, E., & Brandani, S. (2015) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.018 · Cited by 441
Fan, L.-S., Zeng, L., Wang, W., & Luo, S. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee03198a · Cited by 381
Gür, T. M. (2016) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2015.10.004 · Cited by 340
The use of petroleum coke as fuel in chemical-looping combustion
Leion, H., Mattisson, T., & Lyngfelt, A. (2007) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2006.11.037 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Adánez, J., de Diego, L. F., García-Labiano, F., Gayán, P., Abad, A., & Palacios, J. M.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-01-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 371-377
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W1980854042
- Cited by
- 754
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.