Gas and Mercury Adsorption Properties of Woodceramics Made from Chicken Waste
Abstract
Gas-adsorption properties of woodceramics prepared from chicken waste, which was found to be amorphous carbon reinforced by glassy carbon generated from phenolic resin, was studied. The specific surface area as determined by the multipoint BET method was 33.41 m 2 g -1 (N 2, 77 K) and 63.40 m 2 g -1 (CO 2, 195 K), and the adsorption isotherm was of Type IIb (IUPAC classification). These results suggested the presence of narrow micropores and the formation of aggregates with nonrigid slit-shaped pores. Furthermore, from gas-adsorption studies and by preliminary field testing for mercury adsorption using flue gas from a coal-firing power plant, chicken-waste woodceramics was found to function as active carbon. The chicken-waste woodceramics was found to have higher mercury adsorption properties as compared with other woodceramics or a commercially available active carbon. It was presumed that calcium, potassium, sulfur, and other chemical species which were contained as impurities increased the sorption capacity for mercury.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Derived activated carbon by K2CO3 is more effective for gas adsorption than the sample prepared by KOH in terms of porosity and lower ash and sulfur content.
“Tay et al. [121] found that derived AC by K 2 CO 3 is more effective for gas adsorption than prepared sample by KOH in terms of porosity and lower ash and sulfur content.”
From Biomass/Biochar carbon materials for CO2 capture and sequestration by cyclic adsorption processes: A review and prospects for future directions (2022) · cites this paper as [121]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Karimi, M., Shirzad, M., Silva, J. A. C., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2022) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101890 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ozao, R., Okabe, T., Nishimoto, Y., Cao, Y., Whitely, N., & Pan, W.-P.
- Affiliations
- Kanagawa University (JP)
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-04-28
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1729-1734
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2056079484
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Energy & Fuels (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Keywords
- woodceramics, chicken waste, mercury adsorption, gas adsorption, specific surface area, amorphous carbon, glassy carbon, phenolic resin, adsorption isotherms, micropores, flue gas, coal-fired power plants, activated carbon, waste valorization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
