The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impregnated CuO/Al2O3 Oxygen Carriers for Chemical-Looping Combustion: Avoiding Fluidized Bed Agglomeration
Abstract
Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) is a combustion technology with inherent separation of the greenhouse gas CO 2 that involves the use of an oxygen carrier, which transfers oxygen from air to the fuel avoiding the direct contact between them. An oxygen carrier in a CLC power plant must show high reaction rates and sufficient durability in successive cycle reactions. Furthermore, the oxygen carrier particles must not agglomerate. To produce materials with these characteristics, different Cu-based oxygen carriers with a range of CuO content between 10 and 26 wt % were prepared by impregnation using alumina as support. The particles were calcined at different temperatures in the range of 550−950 °C. The oxygen carriers were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray, and thermogravimetry. The samples were evaluated in a fluidized bed facility in order to determine their behavior in multicycle reduction−oxidation tests . A number of 100 cycles was done when the carrier did not agglomerate. The effects of metal content, calcination temperature, and method of preparation on the oxygen carriers reactivity, gas product distribution, attrition rate, and agglomeration were analyzed for the different oxygen carriers. It was observed that the CuO content in the oxygen carrier, the calcination temperature used in the preparation, and the conversion reached by the oxygen carrier during the reduction period affected the agglomeration process. In this work, the preparation conditions to produce Cu-based oxygen carriers with high reactivities, and small attrition rates were found. Moreover, the agglomeration of these oxygen carriers in the fluidized reactor, which is the main reason adduced in the literature to reject the Cu-based oxygen carriers for the CLC process, was avoided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations—a review
Hossain, M. M., & de Lasa, H. I. (2008) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2008.05.028 · Cited by 961
Biomass-based chemical looping technologies: the good, the bad and the future
Zhao, X., Zhou, H., Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Park, A.-H. A., Fennell, P. S., Shen, L., & Fan, L.-S. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee03718f · Cited by 558
Operation of a 10 kWth chemical-looping combustor during 200 h with a CuO–Al2O3 oxygen carrier
de Diego, L. F., Garcı´a-Labiano, F., Gayán, P., Celaya, J., Palacios, J. M., & Adánez, J. (2007) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2006.10.004 · Cited by 292
Self-citationAbad, A., Adánez-Rubio, I., Gayán, P., García-Labiano, F., de Diego, L. F., & Adánez, J. (2012) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.10.016 · Cited by 262
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- de Diego, L. F., Gayán, P., García-Labiano, F., Celaya, J., Abad, A., & Adánez, J.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1850-1856
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2084309919
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impregnated CuO/Al2O3 Oxygen Carriers for Chemical-Looping Combustion: Avoiding Fluidized Bed Agglomeration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef050052f
- The paper
- de Diego, L. F., Gayán, P., García-Labiano, F., Celaya, J., Abad, A., & Adánez, J. (2005). Impregnated CuO/Al2O3 Oxygen Carriers for Chemical-Looping Combustion: Avoiding Fluidized Bed Agglomeration. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef050052f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.