The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Upgrade of Methane from Landfill Gas by Pressure Swing Adsorption
Abstract
This work focuses on the production of pipeline grade methane from landfill gas (LFG). Vacuum pressure swing adsorption technology using a kinetic adsorbent, Carbon Molecular Sieve 3K (Takeda), was employed for the separation of methane−carbon dioxide mixture. Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics of methane and carbon dioxide are reported at 298, 308, and 323 to model the adsorption-based process. A four-step Skarstrom-type cycle was employed comprising pressurization, feed, counter-current blowdown, and counter-current purge with product. Co-current pressurization with feed stream and counter-current pressurization with product were evaluated. The separation of a mixture of CH 4 (55%)−CO 2 (45%) was tested using two different four-step cycles: pressurization with feed stream, feed, blowdown, and purge with product and pressurization with product, feed, blowdown, and purge with product. The results indicate that purity of methane higher than 96% can be obtained with recovery higher than 75%. The difference of the performance in the non-adiabatic and adiabatic cases was also studied. It was observed that the temperature in the column increases allowing a faster and more important desorption of carbon dioxide in the blowdown step, retaining more CO 2 in the column and improving methane purity and recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sun, Q., Li, H., Yan, J., Liu, L., Yu, Z., & Yu, X. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.029 · Cited by 924
Biogas as a renewable energy fuel – A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage
Ullah Khan, I., Hafiz Dzarfan Othman, M., Hashim, H., Matsuura, T., Ismail, A. F., Rezaei-DashtArzhandi, M., & Wan Azelee, I. (2017) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.035 · Cited by 775
Natural gas origin, composition, and processing: A review
Faramawy, S., Zaki, T., & Sakr, A. A.-E. (2016) · Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.030 · Cited by 788
Natural gas treating by selective adsorption: Material science and chemical engineering interplay
Tagliabue, M., Farrusseng, D., Valencia, S., Aguado, S., Ravon, U., Rizzo, C., Corma, A., & Mirodatos, C. (2009) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.010 · Cited by 471
Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications
Kadam, R., & Panwar, N. L. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.167 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavenati, S., Grande, C. A., & Rodrigues, A. E.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-08-25
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2545-2555
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2066566477
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Upgrade of Methane from Landfill Gas by Pressure Swing Adsorption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef050072h
- The paper
- Cavenati, S., Grande, C. A., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2005). Upgrade of Methane from Landfill Gas by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef050072h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.