Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Upgrade of Methane from Landfill Gas by Pressure Swing Adsorption

Cavenati, Simone, Grande, Carlos A., Rodrigues, Alírio E.·2005·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

This work focuses on the production of pipeline grade methane from landfill gas (LFG). Vacuum pressure swing adsorption technology using a kinetic adsorbent, Carbon Molecular Sieve 3K (Takeda), was employed for the separation of methane−carbon dioxide mixture. Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics of methane and carbon dioxide are reported at 298, 308, and 323 to model the adsorption-based process. A four-step Skarstrom-type cycle was employed comprising pressurization, feed, counter-current blowdown, and counter-current purge with product. Co-current pressurization with feed stream and counter-current pressurization with product were evaluated. The separation of a mixture of CH 4 (55%)−CO 2 (45%) was tested using two different four-step cycles: pressurization with feed stream, feed, blowdown, and purge with product and pressurization with product, feed, blowdown, and purge with product. The results indicate that purity of methane higher than 96% can be obtained with recovery higher than 75%. The difference of the performance in the non-adiabatic and adiabatic cases was also studied. It was observed that the temperature in the column increases allowing a faster and more important desorption of carbon dioxide in the blowdown step, retaining more CO 2 in the column and improving methane purity and recovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef050072h

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cavenati, S., Grande, C. A., & Rodrigues, A. E.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2005-08-25
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
2545-2555
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W2066566477
Cited by
182
References
0
FWCI
10.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.