The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward an Understanding of Controlling Parameters in Softwood and Hardwood Pellets Production
Abstract
Production of biofuel pellets from hardwood, such as beech, is often very troublesome as observed in large-scale pellet production plants, where reduction of capacity and frequent blocking may be experienced. The problems may be reduced through a laborious optimization procedure of the process conditions and the utilization of softwood and adhesive materials. To optimize and facilitate such a procedure, a deeper understanding of the fundamental physical−chemical mechanisms that control the pelletizing process is sought after by combining small-scale experiments and an advanced pellet production model. Mixtures of beech rich in corrosive alkali chloride salt, pine softwood, brewers spent grains (BSG), and inorganic additives are experimentally tested using a small-scale pellet mill. It was possible to pelletize a beech/pine mixture containing up to 40% (wt) beech. The addition of 15% (wt) BSG to the beech dust significantly facilitated the pelletizing process. The addition of necessary inorganic anti-slag and anti-corrosive compounds into pellets made of beech may enhance the problems in an unpredictable way. However, if the inorganic additives are added directly into BSG before mixing it with the beech dust, the material can easily be pelletized. A pellet production model is developed that describes the pelletizing pressure variation along the press channels of the matrix. Equations based on differential control volumes are set up to describe the forces acting on the pellet in the matrix. Important model parameters are the sliding friction coefficient, the ratio of compression, and the material-specific parameters, such as the elastic modules and Poisson's ratio. Model calculations show how the variation in the model parameters significantly changes the necessary pelletizing pressure. Using typical material parameters of beech and pine, it is illustrated why beech, in accordance with the experimental test results, is more difficult to pelletize than pine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tumuluru, J. S., Wright, C. T., Hess, J. R., & Kenney, K. L. (2011) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.324 · Cited by 705
Production and utilization of fuel pellets from biomass: A review
Pradhan, P., Mahajani, S. M., & Arora, A. (2018) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.021 · Cited by 434
Wannapeera, J., Fungtammasan, B., & Worasuwannarak, N. (2011) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2011.04.010 · Cited by 348
A review of densified solid biomass for energy production
Bajwa, D. S., Peterson, T., Sharma, N., Shojaeiarani, J., & Bajwa, S. G. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.040 · Cited by 323
Pelletizing properties of torrefied spruce
Stelte, W., Clemons, C., Holm, J. K., Sanadi, A. R., Ahrenfeldt, J., Shang, L., & Henriksen, U. B. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.025 · Cited by 170
Self-citationBiomass Pellet Fuel Production and Utilization in Ghana: A Review
Apraku, S. E., & Shen, Y. (2024) · ACS Sustainable Resource Management · doi:10.1021/acssusresmgt.3c00121 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Holm, J. K., Henriksen, U. B., Hustad, J. E., & Sørensen, L. H.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-09-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2686-2694
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2021787235
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.