The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming of the Aqueous Phase of Bio-Oil in a Fixed Bed Reactor
Abstract
Hydrogen produced from renewable energy sources is of great interest as an alternative to fossil fuels and as a means for power generation via fuel cells. The aqueous fraction of bio-oil can be effectively reformed to hydrogen-rich streams in the presence of active catalytic materials. In this paper, we present the experimental work carried out in a fixed bed reactor for the reforming of bio-oil. The performance of the reactor was studied at various conditions and compared to the values theoretically predicted by thermodynamic equilibrium. The effect of reaction temperature, steam-to-carbon ratio in the feed, and space velocity was investigated in the presence of a commercial nickel catalyst. Runs were conducted with acetic acid, acetone, and ethylene glycol, representative model compounds of bio-oil, and the aqueous phase of a real bio-oil derived from beech wood. The results of the selected model compounds show that all can be effectively reformed with hydrogen yields up to 90% at reaction temperatures higher than 600 °C and steam-to-carbon ratios higher than 3. The reforming of the aqueous fraction of bio-oil proved to be more difficult, with the hydrogen yield fluctuating at about 60%. The most serious problem encountered in these experiments is coking. The formation of carbonaceous deposits in the upper part of the catalyst zone limits the reforming time and necessitates frequent regeneration of the catalyst.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading
Bridgwater, A. V. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048 · Cited by 4,856
Catalysis for conversion of biomass to fuels via pyrolysis and gasification: A review
Bulushev, D. A., & Ross, J. R. H. (2011) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2011.02.005 · Cited by 615
Catalytic steam reforming of bio-oil
Trane, R., Dahl, S., Skjøth-Rasmussen, M. S., & Jensen, A. D. (2012) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.023 · Cited by 401
Ashok, J., & Kawi, S. (2014) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs400621p · Cited by 321
Next‐Generation Biofuels: Survey of Emerging Technologies and Sustainability Issues
Zinoviev, S., Müller‐Langer, F., Das, P., Bertero, N., Fornasiero, P., Kaltschmitt, M., Centi, G., & Miertus, S. (2010) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201000052 · Cited by 318
Li, S., Wu, Y., Dao, M. U., Dragoi, E.-N., & Xia, C. (2023) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137954 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Kechagiopoulos, P. N., Voutetakis, S. S., Lemonidou, A. A., & Vasalos, I. A.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-07-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2155-2163
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2024812293
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.