The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Economics of CO2 Capture Using the Calcium Cycle with a Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustor
Abstract
Flue gas CO 2 capture using a Ca-based chemical looping system has been shown to be potentially more cost-effective than traditional amine-based systems in bench-scale testing. The results of these initial tests are projected, using an Excel-based economic model, to estimate the 30-year levelized cost of CO 2 capture per metric ton (t) for a utility-scale power plant. An order of magnitude capital and operating estimate for a 360 MW pressurized fluidized bed combustor (PFBC) is presented, assuming a western Canadian location. Additional costs for calciners, O 2 plant, and related equipment necessary to create a Ca-based CO 2 chemical capture loop are presented separately. These costs are evaluated in a series of spreadsheets, and the impact of process flows, as well as capital, operating/maintenance, and feedstock costs are determined in a sensitivity analysis. The financial results for CO 2 capture are found to compare favorably with amine-based capture systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of CO2 capture technologies
MacDowell, N., Florin, N., Buchard, A., Hallett, J., Galindo, A., Jackson, G., Adjiman, C. S., Williams, C. K., Shah, N., & Fennell, P. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c004106h · Cited by 1,636
CO2 capture by solid adsorbents and their applications: current status and new trends
Wang, Q., Luo, J., Zhong, Z., & Borgna, A. (2011) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c0ee00064g · Cited by 1,611
Dean, C. C., Blamey, J., Florin, N. H., Al-Jeboori, M. J., & Fennell, P. S. (2011) · Chemical Engineering Research and Design · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2010.10.013 · Cited by 375
Perejón, A., Romeo, L. M., Lara, Y., Lisbona, P., Martínez, A., & Valverde, J. M. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.121 · Cited by 367
Sun, H., Wang, J., Zhao, J., Shen, B., Shi, J., Huang, J., & Wu, C. (2019) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.040 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- MacKenzie, A., Granatstein, D. L., Anthony, E. J., & Abanades, J. C.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-02-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 920-926
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W1979307756
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economics of CO2 Capture Using the Calcium Cycle with a Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef0603378
- The paper
- MacKenzie, A., Granatstein, D. L., Anthony, E. J., & Abanades, J. C. (2007). Economics of CO2 Capture Using the Calcium Cycle with a Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustor. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0603378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
