The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Ash-Forming Matter in Various Solid Fuels by Selective Leaching and Its Implications for Fluidized-Bed Combustion
Abstract
This paper presents the results of standard fuel analyses of 112 different fuels, along with the results from chemical fractionation through selective leaching. The samples, obtained from boilers during the period 1995–2010, represent the following fuel classes: coal, peat, wood-derived fuels, agricultural wastes, and sewage sludge. The leaching results show that coal consists mainly of insoluble ash forming matter, dominated by different silicates. The ash-forming matter in wood-derived fuels is mainly soluble and is dominated by potassium, calcium, and phosphorus; the insoluble ash-forming matter originates from soil contamination. The ash-forming matter in peat has the characteristics of both wood-derived fuels and coal. In agricultural waste, the ash-forming matter is mainly soluble, even though it may contain some silicon, and is dominated by potassium, chlorine, and phosphorus. The ash-forming matter in sludge is mainly acid-soluble or insoluble. It is also important to note that the aluminum silicates present in sludge may capture volatile potassium during combustion, thereby reducing the risk of deposit and corrosion. The ash-forming matter in sludge is often dominated by phosphorus precipitating agents such as iron sulfate and aluminum sulfate. The study demonstrates the value of chemical fractionation through selective leaching as a tool for explaining ash behavior in FBC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boiler deposits from firing biomass fuels
Miles, T. R., Miles, T. R., Baxter, L. L., Bryers, R. W., Jenkins, B. M., & Oden, L. L. (1996) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/0961-9534(95)00067-4 · Cited by 420
Westberg, H. M., Byström, M., & Leckner, B. (2003) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef020060l · Cited by 105
Cited by
Niu, Y., Tan, H., & Hui, S. (2016) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2015.09.003 · Cited by 1,069
Ash contents and ash-forming elements of biomass and their significance for solid biofuel combustion
Vassilev, S. V., Vassileva, C. G., Song, Y.-C., Li, W.-Y., & Feng, J. (2017) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.036 · Cited by 417
Biomass torrefaction: properties, applications, challenges, and economy
Niu, Y., Lv, Y., Lei, Y., Liu, S., Liang, Y., Wang, D., & Hui, S. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109395 · Cited by 384
Release of chlorine during mallee bark pyrolysis
Rahim, M. U., Gao, X., Garcia-Perez, M., Li, Y., & Wu, H. (2013) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef3018157 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Zevenhoven, M., Yrjas, P., Skrifvars, B.-J., & Hupa, M.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-09-14
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 6366-6386
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2315556760
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.