Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utilization of Surfactant-Stabilized Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery by Adding Nanoparticles

Sun, Qian, Li, Zhaomin, Li, Songyan, Jiang, Lei, Wang, Jiqian, Wang, Peng·2014·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Nitrogen foam flooding is a promising technique for enhanced oil recovery, but instability of the foam limits its application. In this article, partially hydrophobic modified SiO 2 nanoparticles with an anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), were used together to increase foam stability. Micromodel flooding and sandpack flooding were adopted to assess the stability and effect on enhanced oil recovery of the SiO 2 stabilized foam (SiO 2 /SDS foam). The experimental data showed that the foam stability was decreased with an increase in temperature, while the foam volume was increased first and then decreased. SiO 2 /SDS foam showed better temperature tolerance than the SDS foam (foam stabilized by SDS) due to the adsorption of nanoparticles on the surface of the bubble. Almost all of the bubbles maintained spherical or ellipsoidal shape with prolonged time due to the enhanced surface dilational viscoelasticity, which was different from that of SDS foam. According to the micromodel flooding results, SiO 2 /SDS foam displaced more oil than brine flooding, SDS solution flooding, or SDS foam flooding. As the foam stability was enhanced, gas mobility and channeling were controlled effectively. In addition, more oil on the pore wall and in the dead-end pores was displaced out because of the higher viscoelasticity of the SiO 2 /SDS foam. The sandpack flooding results showed that the increase of differential pressure and profile control effect was a proportional function of the SiO 2 concentration in SiO 2 /SDS foam. The test with a higher SiO 2 concentration resulted in a higher oil recovery when SiO 2 concentration was less than 1.5 wt %.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef402453b

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sun, Q., Li, Z., Li, S., Jiang, L., Wang, J., & Wang, P.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2014-03-20
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
2384-2394
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W2329446157
Cited by
373
References
9
FWCI
28.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.