The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wettability Determination of the Reservoir Brine−Reservoir Rock System with Dissolution of CO2 at High Pressures and Elevated Temperatures
Abstract
An experimental method has been developed to determine the wettability, i.e., the contact angle, of a reservoir brine−reservoir rock system with dissolution of CO 2 at high pressures and elevated temperatures by using the axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA) technique for the sessile drop case. Prior to the experiment, a rock slide is horizontally placed in a specially designed rock slide holder in a see-through windowed high-pressure cell, which is subsequently filled with CO 2 at a prespecified pressure and a constant temperature. Then, a reservoir brine sample is introduced by using a syringe delivery system to form a sessile brine drop on the rock slide inside the pressure cell. The sequential digital images of the dynamic sessile brine drop are acquired and analyzed by applying computer-aided image acquisition and processing techniques to measure the dynamic contact angles at different times. It is found that the dynamic contact angle between the reservoir brine and the reservoir rock remains almost constant at a given pressure and a constant temperature, though CO 2 is gradually dissolved into the sessile brine drop which is eventually saturated with CO 2 . It is also found that the equilibrium contact angle increases as the pressure increases, whereas it decreases as the temperature increases. Such wettability alteration may significantly affect the storage capacity when CO 2 is injected into a saline aquifer or a depleted oil reservoir at high pressures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ali, M., Jha, N. K., Pal, N., Keshavarz, A., Hoteit, H., & Sarmadivaleh, M. (2022) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103895 · Cited by 490
Comprehensive Review of Caprock-Sealing Mechanisms for Geologic Carbon Sequestration
Song, J., & Zhang, D. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es301610p · Cited by 388
Iglauer, S., Mathew, M. S., & Bresme, F. (2012) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.052 · Cited by 289
Pore-scale imaging of trapped supercritical carbon dioxide in sandstones and carbonates
Andrew, M., Bijeljic, B., & Blunt, M. J. (2014) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.12.018 · Cited by 270
The Nanoscale Basis of CO2 Trapping for Geologic Storage
Bourg, I. C., Beckingham, L. E., & DePaolo, D. J. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03003 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, D., Gu, Y., & Tontiwachwuthikul, P.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-11-30
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 504-509
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2050041263
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.