The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemical-Looping Combustion and Chemical-Looping Reforming in a Circulating Fluidized-Bed Reactor Using Ni-Based Oxygen Carriers
Open accessAbstract
Three oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion and chemical-looping reforming have been investigated in a small circulating fluidized-bed reactor. N2AM1400 was produced by freeze granulation with MgAl 2 O 4 as a support material and had a NiO content of 20%. Ni18-αAl was produced by impregnation onto α-Al 2 O 3 and had a NiO content of 18%. Ni21-γAl was produced by impregnation onto γ-Al 2 O 3 and had a NiO content of 21%. Over 160 h of operation has been recorded. The conversion of natural gas into products was 96−100% depending on oxygen carrier and experimental conditions. For chemical-looping combustion, N2AM1400 and Ni21-γAl provided poor selectivity toward CO 2 and H 2 O while Ni18-αAl initially showed very high selectivity, which declined as a function of time. For chemical-looping reforming, operating the reactor at the desired process parameters, which was a fuel reactor temperature of 950 °C and an air factor of 0.30, was possible with all of the tested oxygen-carrier materials. When only natural gas was used as fuel, there was significant formation of solid carbon in the fuel reactor for Ni18-αAl and Ni21-γAl. Adding 30% steam or CO 2 to the fuel removed or decreased the carbon formation. During the course of the experiments, N2AM1400 and Ni18-αAl retained their physical and chemical structure, while Ni21-γAl displayed a significant reduction in porosity but remained highly reactive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Self-citationReview of hydrogen production using chemical-looping technology
Luo, M., Yi, Y., Wang, S., Wang, Z., Du, M., Pan, J., & Wang, Q. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.007 · Cited by 528
Chen, D., He, D., Lu, J., Zhong, L., Liu, F., Liu, J., Yu, J., Wan, G., He, S., & Luo, Y. (2017) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.053 · Cited by 447
Hydrogen production from the thermochemical conversion of biomass: issues and challenges
Dou, B., Zhang, H., Song, Y., Zhao, L., Jiang, B., He, M., Ruan, C., Chen, H., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Sustainable Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1039/c8se00535d · Cited by 323
Chemical Looping Combustion: Status and Development Challenges
Lyngfelt, A. (2020) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01454 · Cited by 264
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rydén, M., Lyngfelt, A., & Mattisson, T.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-06-14
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2585-2597
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2091306662
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical-Looping Combustion and Chemical-Looping Reforming in a Circulating Fluidized-Bed Reactor Using Ni-Based Oxygen Carriers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef800065m
- The paper
- Rydén, M., Lyngfelt, A., & Mattisson, T. (2008). Chemical-Looping Combustion and Chemical-Looping Reforming in a Circulating Fluidized-Bed Reactor Using Ni-Based Oxygen Carriers. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800065m
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.