The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of Catalytic Conditioning of Biomass-Derived Syngas
Abstract
Thermochemical conversion of biomass to create fuels and chemical products may be achieved through the gasification route via syngas. The resulting biomass-derived raw syngas contains the building blocks of carbon monoxide and hydrogen as well as undesired impurities, such as tars, hydrocarbons, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, hydrogen chloride, and other trace contaminants. These impurities require removal, usually through catalytic conditioning, to produce a quality syngas for end-use synthesis of liquid fuels, such as mixed alcohols and Fischer−Tropsch liquids. In the past decade, significant research attention has been focused on these catalytic processes. This contribution builds on previous reviews and focuses on capturing the work on catalytic conditioning of biomass-derived syngas that have been performed since the Dayton review in 2002, with an emphasis on tar destruction and steam reforming catalysts. This review organizes and discusses the investigations of catalytic conditioning of biomass-derived syngas with various catalyst formulations and also discusses the roles of catalyst additives. Key technical challenges and research areas for the advancement of liquid fuel synthesis via thermochemical conversion of biomass are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bio-ethanol catalytic steam reforming over supported metal catalysts
Auprêtre, F., Descorme, C., & Duprez, D. (2002) · Catalysis Communications · doi:10.1016/s1566-7367(02)00118-8 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Ammonia and related chemicals as potential indirect hydrogen storage materials
Lan, R., Irvine, J. T. S., & Tao, S. (2012) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.004 · Cited by 1,207
Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: A review
Anis, S., & Zainal, Z. A. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.018 · Cited by 802
Lee, J., Kim, K.-H., & Kwon, E. E. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.002 · Cited by 668
A review of cleaning technologies for biomass-derived syngas
Woolcock, P. J., & Brown, R. C. (2013) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.036 · Cited by 623
Deactivation of cobalt based Fischer–Tropsch catalysts: A review
Tsakoumis, N. E., Rønning, M., Borg, Ø., Rytter, E., & Holmen, A. (2010) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2010.02.077 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Yung, M. M., Jablonski, W. S., & Magrini-Bair, K. A.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-03-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1874-1887
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2011735785
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.