Cited by 802Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesMining and Gasification TechnologiesChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes

Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: A review

Anis, Samsudin, Zainal, Z.A.·2011·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using nanocatalysts improves conversion efficiency, enhances gas products' quality, and reduces tar content.

    “Using nanocatalysts improve the conversion efficiency and enhance the gas products' quality as well as reducing the tar content.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anis, S., & Zainal, Z. A.
Affiliations
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Zainal, Z.A.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
2355-2377
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048806836
Cited by
802
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 27
FWCI
21.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mining and Gasification Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Keywords
tar removal, biomass gasification, tar condensation, catalytic tar removal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review