Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highly Efficient Liquefaction of Woody Biomass in Hot-Compressed Alcohol−Water Co-solvents

Cheng, Shuna, D’cruz, Ian, Wang, Mingcun, Leitch, Mathew, Xu, Chunbao (Charles)·2010·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Alcohol (methanol or ethanol) and water showed synergistic effects on biomass direct liquefaction, and the 50 wt % co-solvent of either methanol−water or ethanol−water was found to be the most effective solvent for the liquefaction of eastern white pine sawdust. The 50 wt % aqueous alcohol at 300 °C for 15 min produced a bio-oil yield at approximately 65 wt % and a biomass conversion of >95%. At a temperature higher than 300 °C, conversion of bio-oil to char was significant by repolymerization. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and gas chromatography−mass spectrometry (GC−MS) analyses of the obtained bio-oils confirmed the presence of primarily phenolic compounds and their derivatives (such as benzenes), followed by aldehyde, long-chain (and cyclic) ketone and alcohol, ester, organic acid, and ether compounds. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) results suggested that hot-compressed ethanol as the liquefaction solvent favored lignin degradation into monomeric phenols. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of sawdust before and after the liquefaction displayed that the cellulosic structure of the feedstock was completely converted into amorphous carbon at around 300 °C and into crystalline carbon at about 350 °C.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef901218w

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, S., D’cruz, I., Wang, M., Leitch, M., & Xu, C. (.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2010-02-15
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
4659-4667
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W2024114199
Cited by
318
References
2
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.