The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Additives To Lower and Stabilize the Viscosity of Pyrolysis Oils during Storage
Abstract
The initial development of additives to stabilize the viscosity of biocrude during long-term storage has produced dramatic results. The additives investigated were ethyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone and methanol, acetone, methanol, acetone and methanol, and ethanol. These additives represent three chemical families, which all demonstrated the ability to drastically reduce the aging rate of biocrude, as defined by the increase in viscosity with time. Accelerated aging tests were run at 90 °C to screen the additives. The additives not only lowered the initial viscosity at 40 °C by half but also reduced the aging rate of a hot gas filtered pyrolysis oil made from hybrid poplar (NREL run 175) by factors of 1−18 compared to the original pure oil. With the best additive, methanol, at a 10 wt % level in the pyrolysis oil, the modified biocrude was still a single-phase liquid and still met the ASTM No. 4 diesel fuel specification for viscosity even after 96 h exposure to 90 °C. Based on the aging rate at 90 °C recently determined for pure biocrude without additives, the pure biocrude tested would have exceeded the allowable ASTM No. 4 viscosity after only 2.6 h. In addition, the unmodified biocrude formed a waxy precipitate that floated on top of the liquid phase after 8 h exposure to 90 °C. Use of methanol with previously aged oils greatly reduces the resultant viscosity, but not quite as effectively as the use of the methanol shortly after the pyrolysis oil is produced. The cost of the additive, e.g., methanol, may be offset by the heating value it adds to the pyrolysis oil, depending on the local cost of each.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review
Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., & Steele, P. H. (2006) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef0502397 · Cited by 5,663
Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading
Bridgwater, A. V. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048 · Cited by 4,856
Renewable Fuels and Chemicals by Thermal Processing of Biomass
Bridgwater, A. V. (2003) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/s1385-8947(02)00142-0 · Cited by 1,920
A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass
Dhyani, V., & Bhaskar, T. (2018) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.035 · Cited by 1,545
Bio-oil production and upgrading research: A review
Xiu, S., & Shahbazi, A. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.028 · Cited by 1,127
Metadata
- Authors
- Diebold, J. P., & Czernik, S.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-09-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1081-1091
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W1995302583
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additives To Lower and Stabilize the Viscosity of Pyrolysis Oils during Storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef9700339
- The paper
- Diebold, J. P., & Czernik, S. (1997). Additives To Lower and Stabilize the Viscosity of Pyrolysis Oils during Storage. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9700339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.