The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Method to Measure Effective Soil Solution Concentration Predicts Copper Availability to Plants
Abstract
Risk assessments of metal contaminated soils need to address metal bioavailability. To predict the bioavailability of metals to plants, it is necessary to understand both solution and solid phase supply processes in soils. In striving to find surrogate chemical measurements, scientists have focused either on soil solution chemistry, including free ion activities, or operationally defined fractions of metals. Here we introduce the new concept of effective concentration, CE, which includes both the soil solution concentration and an additional term, expressed as a concentration, that represents metal supplied from the solid phase. CE was measured using the technique of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) which, like a plant, locally lowers soil solution concentrations, inducing metal supply from the solid phase, as shown by a dynamic model of the DGT-soil system. Measurements of Cu as CE, soil solution concentration, by EDTA extraction and as free Cu2+ activity in soil solution were made on 29 different soils covering a large range of copper concentrations. Theywere compared to Cu concentrations in the plant material of Lepidium heterophyllum grown on the same soils. Plant concentrations were linearly related and highly correlated with CE but were more scattered and nonlinear with respect to free Cu2+ activity, EDTA extraction, or soil solution concentrations. These results demonstrate that the dominant supply processes in these soils are diffusion and labile metal release, which the DGT-soil system mimics. The quantity CE is shown to have promise as a quantitative measure of the bioavailable metal in soils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50043a017 · Cited by 12,052
Cited by
Phytoremediation of metals, metalloids, and radionuclides
McGrath, S. P., Zhao, J., & Lombi, E. (2002) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(02)75002-5 · Cited by 506
Self-citationDegryse, F., Smolders, E., & Parker, D. R. (2009) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01142.x · Cited by 403
Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., Zablotskaja, M., & Vijver, M. G. (2007) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.02.008 · Cited by 326
Gu, H.-H., Qiu, H., Tian, T., Zhan, S.-S., Deng, T.-H.-B., Chaney, R. L., Wang, S.-Z., Tang, Y.-T., Morel, J.-L., & Qiu, R.-L. (2011) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.014 · Cited by 326
Chemical Speciation, Plant Uptake, and Toxicity of Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soils
Uchimiya, M., Bannon, D., Nakanishi, H., McBride, M. B., Williams, M. A., & Yoshihara, T. (2020) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00183 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Zhao, F.-J., Sun, B., Davison, W., & Mcgrath, S. P.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-05-18
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2602-2607
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2047445452
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Method to Measure Effective Soil Solution Concentration Predicts Copper Availability to Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es000268q
- The paper
- Zhang, H., Zhao, F.-J., Sun, B., Davison, W., & Mcgrath, S. P. (2001). A New Method to Measure Effective Soil Solution Concentration Predicts Copper Availability to Plants. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es000268q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.