Cited by 506Heavy metals in environmentHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Phytoremediation of metals, metalloids, and radionuclides

McGrath, S.P., Zhao, J., Lombi, E.·2002·Advances in Agronomy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0065-2113(02)75002-5

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGrath, S. P., Zhao, J., & Lombi, E.
Venue
Advances in Agronomy
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2002
Pages
1-56
ISSN
0065-2113 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1505991675
Cited by
506
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 19
FWCI
57.49
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in agronomy (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
phytoremediation, metal hyperaccumulators, phytoextraction, phytovolatilization, metalloids, radionuclides, metal sequestration, soil remediation, heavy metals, arsenic, selenium, lead, cadmium, mercury, nickel, zinc, cobalt, copper

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review