The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Partition-Limited Model for the Plant Uptake of Organic Contaminants from Soil and Water
Abstract
In dealing with the passive transport of organic contaminants from soils to plants (including crops), a partition-limited model is proposed in which (i) the maximum (equilibrium) concentration of a contaminant in any location in the plant is determined by partition equilibrium with its concentration in the soil interstitial water, which in turn is determined essentially by the concentration in the soil organic matter (SOM) and (ii) the extent of approach to partition equilibrium, as measured by the ratio of the contaminant concentrations in plantwater and soil interstitial water, alphapt (< or = 1), depends on the transport rate of the contaminant in soil water into the plant and the volume of soil water solution that is required for the plant contaminant level to reach equilibrium with the external soil-water phase. Through reasonable estimates of plant organic-water compositions and of contaminant partition coefficients with various plant components, the model accounts for calculated values of alphapt in several published crop-contamination studies, including near-equilibrium values (i.e., alphapt approximately equals 1) for relatively water-soluble contaminants and lower values for much less soluble contaminants; the differences are attributed to the much higher partition coefficients of the less soluble compounds between plant lipids and plant water, which necessitates much larger volumes of the plant water transport for achieving the equilibrium capacities. The model analysis indicates that for plants with high water contents the plant-water phase acts as the major reservoir for highly water-soluble contaminants. By contrast, the lipid in a plant, even at small amounts, is usually the major reservoir for highly water-insoluble contaminants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Contamination and remediation of phthalic acid esters in agricultural soils in China: a review
He, L., Gielen, G., Bolan, N. S., Zhang, X., Qin, H., Huang, H., & Wang, H. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-014-0270-1 · Cited by 272
Wen, B., Wu, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Hu, X., Huang, H., & Zhang, S. (2016) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.032 · Cited by 229
Wen, B., Li, L., Zhang, H., Ma, Y., Shan, X.-Q., & Zhang, S. (2014) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.09.040 · Cited by 210
Wen, B., Li, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Hu, X., Shan, X.-Q., & Zhang, S. (2013) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1637-9 · Cited by 159
Soil quality assessment under emerging regulatory requirements
Bone, J., Head, M., Barraclough, D., Archer, M., Scheib, C., Flight, D., & Voulvoulis, N. (2010) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2010.04.010 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiou, C. T., Sheng, G., & Manes, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-03-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1437-1444
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2065617207
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Partition-Limited Model for the Plant Uptake of Organic Contaminants from Soil and Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es0017561
- The paper
- Chiou, C. T., Sheng, G., & Manes, M. (2001). A Partition-Limited Model for the Plant Uptake of Organic Contaminants from Soil and Water. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0017561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.