Cited by 229Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluoride Effects and RemovalToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

The roles of protein and lipid in the accumulation and distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in plants grown in biosolids-amended soils

Open access
Wen, Bei, Wu, Yali, Zhang, Hongna, Liu, Yu, Hu, Xiaoyu, Huang, Honglin, Zhang, Shuzhen·2016·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

The roles of protein and lipid in the accumulation and distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in seven species of plants from biosolids-amended soils were investigated. The PFOS and PFOA root concentration factors (Croot/Csoil) ranged from 1.37 to 4.68 and 1.69 to 10.3 (ng/groot)/(ng/gsoil), respectively, while the translocation factors (Cshoot/Croot) ranged from 0.055 to 0.16 and 0.093 to 1.8 (ng/gshoot)/(ng/groot), respectively. The PFOS and PFOA accumulations in roots correlated positively with root protein contents (P < 0.05), while negatively with root lipid contents (P < 0.05). These suggested the promotion effects of protein and inhibition effects of lipid on root uptake. The translocation factors correlated positively with the ratios between protein contents in shoots to those in roots (P < 0.05), showing the importance of protein on PFOS and PFOA translocation. This study is the first to reveal the different roles of protein and lipid in the accumulation and distribution of PFOS and PFOA in plants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.032

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wen, B., Wu, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Hu, X., Huang, H., & Zhang, S.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CN)
Corresponding author
Wen, Bei
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
216
Pages
682-688
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2467077856
Cited by
229
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation (21537005, 41371460, 21321004)
  • Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB14020202)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, biosolids-amended soil, plant uptake, root proteins, translocation factor, root concentration factor, plant tissue distribution, perfluorinated compounds, phytoremediation
MeSH terms
Biological Transport, Caprylates, Fluorocarbons, Plant Proteins, Plants, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Plant Roots, Lipid Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review