The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrochemical Properties of Natural Organic Matter (NOM), Fractions of NOM, and Model Biogeochemical Electron Shuttles
Abstract
In this study, cyclic voltammetry was used to characterize the redox properties of natural organic matter (NOM). Using a stationary platinum working electrode, minimal concentrations of electrolyte, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as the solvent, we were able to resolve two pairs of oxidation and reduction peaks for a fraction of Georgetown NOM that is enriched in polyphenolic moieties (NOM-PP). Applying our method to other fractions of Georgetown NOM, and to samples of NOM from a wide range of other sources, gave cyclic voltammograms (CVs) that generally contained fewer distinguishing features than those obtained with NOM-PP. For comparison, CVs were also obtained using our method on six quinone model compounds: anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS), lawsone, juglone, menadione, menaquinone-4, and ubiquinone-5. The CVs of these quinones were similar in shape to the CV of NOM-PP, consistent with the notion that quinones are the dominant redox-active moieties associated with NOM. Quantitative analysis of the peaks in these CVs showed that the peak potentials (Ep) were separated by more than 0.059 V and that the peak currents (i(p)) were linearly related to the square root of the scan rate (v0.5) and concentration (C) for both NOM-PP and the model quinones. Equivalent results were obtained with a rotating Pt disk electrode. From this we conclude that NOM-PP and the model quinones undergo similar sequences of two one-electron, quasi-reversible, diffusion controlled, electron transfers at the Pt electrode surface in DMSO. Although it is difficult to relate these results to Nernstian standard potentials vs the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) under aqueous conditions, it is clear that the apparent formal potential for NOM-PP lies between the corresponding potentials for menadione and juglone and well above that of AQDS. Attempts to derive correlations between Ep and i(p) for the NOMs with quantifiable electrode response and other measurable properties of NOM (including trace metal content and UV-vis absorbance) did not yield any strong relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration
Lovley, D. R., Coates, J. D., Blunt-Harris, E. L., Phillips, E. J. P., & Woodward, J. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382445a0 · Cited by 1,834
Cited by
Rapid electron transfer by the carbon matrix in natural pyrogenic carbon
Sun, T., Levin, B. D. A., Guzman, J. J. L., Enders, A., Muller, D. A., Angenent, L. T., & Lehmann, J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14873 · Cited by 626
Jiang, J., & Kappler, A. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es7023803 · Cited by 323
O’Loughlin, E. J. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es800686d · Cited by 134
O'Loughlin, E., Gorski, C., & Scherer, M. (2015) · Current Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1877944105666150421001126 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Nurmi, J. T., & Tratnyek, P. G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-01-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 617-624
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2029764853
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.