The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Peer Reviewed: What Future for Carbon Capture and Sequestration?
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVFeaturesNEXTPeer Reviewed: What Future for Carbon Capture and Sequestration?New technologies could reduce carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere while still allowing the use of fossil fuelsHoward J. HerzogCite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 7, 148A–153APublication Date (Web):April 1, 2001Publication History Published online1 April 2001Published inissue 1 April 2001https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es012307jhttps://doi.org/10.1021/es012307jnewsACS Publications. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views18827Altmetric-Citations414LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (33 MB) Get e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Carbon capture and storage Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review
Samanta, A., Zhao, A., Shimizu, G. K. H., Sarkar, P., & Gupta, R. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie200686q · Cited by 1,889
Perspectives on Microalgal CO2-Emission Mitigation Systems—A Review
Ho, S.-H., Chen, C.-Y., Lee, D.-J., & Chang, J.-S. (2011) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.11.001 · Cited by 580
Jang, J. G., Kim, G. M., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. K. (2016) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.017 · Cited by 419
Capture of CO2 from combustion gases in a fluidized bed of CaO
Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Lu, D. Y., Salvador, C., & Alvarez, D. (2004) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.10132 · Cited by 373
Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Adsorption on Cation-Exchanged SSZ-13 Zeolites
Pham, T. D., Liu, Q., & Lobo, R. F. (2013) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la304138z · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Herzog, H. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 148A-153A
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2079435264
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peer Reviewed: What Future for Carbon Capture and Sequestration? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es012307j
- The paper
- Herzog, H. J. (2001). Peer Reviewed: What Future for Carbon Capture and Sequestration? Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es012307j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
