The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modes of Action in Ecotoxicology: Their Role in Body Burdens, Species Sensitivity, QSARs, and Mixture Effects
Abstract
In contrast to the general research attitude in the basic sciences, environmental sciences are often goal-driven and should provide the scientific basis for risk assessment procedures, cleanup, and precautionary measures and finally provide a decision support for policy and management. Hence, the prominent role of mechanistic studies in ecotoxicology is not only to understand the impact of pollutants on living organisms but also to deduce general principles for the categorization and assessment of effects. The goal of this review is, therefore, not to provide an exhaustive coverage of modes of toxic action and their underlying biochemical mechanisms but rather to discuss critically the application of this knowledge in ecotoxicological risk assessment. Knowing the mechanism or, at least the mode of toxic action is indispensable for developing descriptive and predictive models in ecotoxicology. This review seeks to show the crucial role of target sites, interactions with the target site(s), and mechanisms for an adequate and efficient ecotoxicological risk assessment. Emphasis in the discussion is on target effect concentrations (or target occupancy), species selectivity and species sensitivity, time perspective of effect studies, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR), and mixture toxicity. A particular focus of this review is on multiple mechanisms. Although the illustrative examples were mainly taken from studies in aquatic ecotoxicology, the proposed conceptual approach is also in principle applicable and even particularly useful for soil and sediment systems. Recommendations for further research and developments include the use of internal effect concentrations and target site concentrations in site-specific risk assessment and as a mixture toxicity parameter as well as general considerations for the derivation of mechanistically meaningful QSAR and other predictive models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology
Kahru, A., & Dubourguier, H.-C. (2010) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2009.08.016 · Cited by 788
Buschmann, J., Berg, M., Stengel, C., Winkel, L., Sampson, M. L., Trang, P. T. K., & Viet, P. H. (2008) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2007.12.025 · Cited by 309
Daughton, C. G. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.109 · Cited by 177
Screening for PBT Chemicals among the “Existing” and “New” Chemicals of the EU
Strempel, S., Scheringer, M., Ng, C. A., & Hungerbühler, K. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3002713 · Cited by 159
Assessment of predictive models for estimating the acute aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals
Melnikov, F., Kostal, J., Voutchkova-Kostal, A., Zimmerman, J. B., & T. Anastas, P. (2016) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c6gc00720a · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Escher, B. I., & Hermens, J. L. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-09-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4201-4217
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2006642896
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modes of Action in Ecotoxicology: Their Role in Body Burdens, Species Sensitivity, QSARs, and Mixture Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es015848h
- The paper
- Escher, B. I., & Hermens, J. L. M. (2002). Modes of Action in Ecotoxicology: Their Role in Body Burdens, Species Sensitivity, QSARs, and Mixture Effects. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es015848h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.