Cited by 159Toxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Screening for PBT Chemicals among the “Existing” and “New” Chemicals of the EU

Strempel, Sebastian, Scheringer, Martin, Ng, Carla A., Hungerbühler, Konrad·2012·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Under the European chemicals legislation, REACH, industrial chemicals that are imported or manufactured at more than 10 t/yr need to be evaluated with respect to their persistence (P), bioaccumulation potential (B), and toxicity (T). This assessment has to be conducted for several 10,000 of chemicals but, at the same time, empirical data on degradability, bioaccumulation potential and toxicity of industrial chemicals are still scarce. Therefore, the identification of PBT chemicals among all chemicals on the market remains a challenge. We present a PBT screening of approximately 95,000 chemicals based on a comparison of estimated P, B, and T properties of each chemical with the P, B, and T thresholds defined under REACH. We also apply this screening procedure to a set of 2576 high production volume chemicals and a set of 2781 chemicals from the EU's former list of "new chemicals" (ELINCS). In the set of 95,000 chemicals, the fraction of potential PBT chemicals is around 3%, but in the ELINCS chemicals it reaches 5%. We identify the most common structural elements among the potential PBT chemicals. Analysis of the P, B, and T data for all chemicals considered here shows that the uncertainty in persistence data contributes most to the uncertainty in the number of potential PBT chemicals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es3002713

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fluorinated alternatives are similarly resistant to ultimate degradation (i.e., persistent) in the environment as long-chain PFASs.

    “Nevertheless, we do know that these replacements will be similarly resistant to ultimate degradation, i.e. persistent, in the environment as long-chain PFASs (Scheringer et al., 2013;Strempel et al., 2012).”

    From Helsingør Statement on poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) (2014) · cites this paper as Strempel et al., 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strempel, S., Scheringer, M., Ng, C. A., & Hungerbühler, K.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Scheringer, Martin
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2012-05-11
Volume
46
Issue
11
Pages
5680-5687
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2325832679
Cited by
159
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
persistent bioaccumulative toxic chemicals, REACH regulation, compound screening, persistence, bioaccumulation potential, toxicity, high production volume chemicals, new chemicals, degradability, structural elements
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, European Union, Hazardous Substances, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review