The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilevel Cycle of Anthropogenic Copper
Abstract
A comprehensive contemporary cycle for stocks and flows of copper is characterized and presented, incorporating information on extraction, processing, fabrication and manufacturing, use, discard, recycling, final disposal, and dissipation. The analysis is performed on an annual basis, ca. 1994, at three discrete governmental unit levels--56 countries or country groups that together comprise essentially all global anthropogenic copper stocks and flows, nine world regions, and the planet as a whole. Cycles for all of these are presented and discussed, and a "best estimate" global copper cycle is constructed to resolve aggregation discrepancies. Among the most interesting results are (1) transformation rates and recycling rates in apparently similar national economies differ by factors of two or more (country level); (2) the discard flows that have the greatest potential for copper recycling are those with low magnitude flows but high copper concentrations--electronics, electrical equipment, and vehicles (regional level); (3) worldwide, about 53% of the copper that was discarded in various forms was recovered and reused or recycled (global level); (4) the highest rate of transfer of discarded copper to repositories is into landfills, but the annual amount of copper deposited in mine tailings is nearly as high (global level); and (5) nearly 30% of copper mining occurred merely to replace copper that was discarded. The results provide a framework for similar studies of other anthropogenic resource cycles as well as a basis for supplementary studies in resource stocks, industrial resource utilization, waste management, industrial economics, and environmental impacts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture
Levin, S. A. (1992) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941447 · Cited by 6,792
Wiens, J. A. (1989) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2389612 · Cited by 3,689
An Information-Intensive Approach to the Molecular Pharmacology of Cancer
Weinstein, J. N., Myers, T. G., O'Connor, P. M., Friend, S. H., Fornace, A. J., Kohn, K. W., Fojo, T., Bates, S. E., Rubinstein, L. V., Anderson, N. L., et al. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5298.343 · Cited by 1,183
The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey
Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00092-0 · Cited by 1,115
M., D. W., & Cleveland, W. S. (1986) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422498 · Cited by 434
Mathematical and Computational Challenges in Population Biology and Ecosystems Science
Levin, S. A., Grenfell, B., Hastings, A., & Perelson, A. S. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5298.334 · Cited by 382
Mineral Resources, Economics and the Environment
Kesler, S. E., & Simon, A. C. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139871426 · Cited by 321
The contemporary European copper cycle: waste management subsystem
Bertram, M., Graedel, T. E., Rechberger, H., & Spatari, S. (2002) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00100-3 · Cited by 183
Self-citationLiss, P. S., Rosswall, T., Woodmansee, R. G., & Risser, P. G. (1989) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261000 · Cited by 177
Dynamic substance flow analysis: the delaying mechanism of stocks, with the case of PVC in Sweden
Kleijn, R., Huele, R., & van der Voet, E. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00090-7 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Stock dynamics for forecasting material flows—Case study for housing in The Netherlands
B. Müller, D. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.025 · Cited by 513
Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models
Pauliuk, S., Arvesen, A., Stadler, K., & Hertwich, E. G. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3148 · Cited by 288
Forging the Anthropogenic Iron Cycle
Wang, T., Müller, D. B., & Graedel, T. E. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es062761t · Cited by 288
Self-citationMaterial Flow Analysis from Origin to Evolution
Graedel, T. E. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03413 · Cited by 282
Self-citationAnthropogenic Nickel Cycle: Insights into Use, Trade, and Recycling
Reck, B. K., Müller, D. B., Rostkowski, K., & Graedel, T. E. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es072108l · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Graedel, T. E., van Beers, D., Bertram, M., Fuse, K., Gordon, R. B., Gritsinin, A., Kapur, A., Klee, R. J., Lifset, R. J., Memon, L., Rechberger, H., Spatari, S., & Vexler, D.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-01-16
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1242-1252
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2061706369
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 16.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multilevel Cycle of Anthropogenic Copper. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es030433c
- The paper
- Graedel, T. E., van Beers, D., Bertram, M., Fuse, K., Gordon, R. B., Gritsinin, A., Kapur, A., Klee, R. J., Lifset, R. J., Memon, L., Rechberger, H., Spatari, S., & Vexler, D. (2004). Multilevel Cycle of Anthropogenic Copper. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es030433c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.